Re: Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- From: "Chuck---" <Chuck---@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:48:21 -0600
"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uGyYjE5$FHA.2784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Chuck--- wrote:
>> Hi Experts:
>>
>> 1) My faithful Zone Alarm Free, after years, went 'True Vector' belly up
>> with a new version install;
>> 2) Sygate won't install at all;
>> 3) Kerio installed, but locks me out of everything (FAQ needs study).
>>
>> In the meantime, I have the MS built-in XP firewall, (and AVG) defending
>> me from Evil Doers. I haven't noticed much discussion on this XP feature
>> here. Am I fairly well protected, or should I try harder on the others?
>>
>> A check shows that my ports are stealthed (good), but I don't get any
>> feedback (bad), like the reports ZA gave me, or that it is working at
>> all. All my security patches are current. Am I just suffering from a lack
>> of feedback gratification and should not be concerned?
>>
>> Your advice please. Thanks, Chuck---
>>
>>
>
>
> WinXP's built-in firewall is adequate at stopping incoming attacks, and
> hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's firewall does not do, is
> provide an important additional layer of protection by informing you about
> any Trojans or spyware that you (or someone else using your computer)
> might download and install inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going
> network traffic at all, other than to check for IP-spoofing, much less
> block (or at even ask you about) the bad or the questionable out-going
> signals. It assumes that any application you have on your hard drive is
> there because you want it there, and therefore has your "permission" to
> access the Internet. Further, because the Windows Firewall is a
> "stateful" firewall, it will also assume that any incoming traffic that's
> a direct response to a Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is also
> authorized.
>
> ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Sygate are all much better than WinXP's built-in
> firewall, in that they do provide that extra layer of protection, are much
> more easily configured, and have free versions readily available for
> downloading. Even the commercially available Symantec's Norton Personal
> Firewall provides superior protection, although it does take a heavier
> toll of system performance then do ZoneAlarm or Sygate.
>
Bruce Chambers
>Help us help you:
> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Bruce - Thanks for the information. My confidence level with the MS firewall
is set at Medium.. I'm doing a Trial with F-Prot - it installed without
hassle unlike the others I mentioned, and the Icelanders have been in
business for as long as I can remember and are fairly reliable. Sure, what
else does one have to do in Iceland but chase viruses? ..;))
Thanks again, Chuck---
.
- References:
- Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- From: Chuck---
- Re: Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- From: Bruce Chambers
- Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- Prev by Date: Re: denied access
- Next by Date: Re: Cannot access files on D drive after reinstalling XP Pro
- Previous by thread: Re: Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- Next by thread: Re: Commercial Firewall(s) and MS' XP version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading