Re: Can you really 100% clean a compromised machine 100% of the ti

From: -Draino- (Draino_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/20/05

  • Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Can you really 100% clean a compromised machine 100% of the ti"
    Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:05:04 -0800
    
    

    First of all everone here had to understand the issue here......"TIME vs.
    MONEY"

    A brand new machine will only cost $350.00 dollars from DELL.

    So with that in mind you MUST come in at no more than $150.00 or most people
    won't spend the money or they will just get a new machine, at least that's
    their logic.

    Assymilating a machine into my network takes 2 minutes. A copy backup of the
    MY DOCUMENTS folder take about 5 minutes at most.

    A machine designed for XP will install in 39 minutes (XPSP2 intergrated with
    all updates). So now we are at about 44 minutes. I install Norton 2005 on all
    XP machines, Microsoft Anit Spyware Beta, Ad-Aware and Spybot Search &
    Destroy. So add 30 minutes for that and that's my 1½.

    I don't install and/or configure any Office programs or configure any e-mail
    programs......they did it once they can do it again.

    I will install a print driver for them. At least that way they can print
    when they hook up their computer.

    95% of all clients don't have anything they want saved anyway..

    OK so real world about 2 hours MAX. Nothing ever goes as planned :)

    -D-

    "Kerry Brown" wrote:

    >
    > "-Draino-" <Draino@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    > news:3C7D58E5-33F9-46FA-95B7-22DC8F42B33C@microsoft.com...
    > > Ok here's the deal. I think the only way to "Certify 100% Clean" is to
    > > format
    > > and re-install the OS...........period.
    > >
    > > The bottom line is I can save all of the customers data, do a fomat,
    > > re-install with all the updates and install anti-virus software in about
    > > 1½
    > > hours. Plus setup file sharing, networking, and make many tweaks. Why even
    > > mess around trying to clean when most of the time it is just not going to
    > > work.
    > >
    > > I get $130.00 for each machine, flat rate. I usually do about 10 machines
    > > a
    > > month, so it makes for some nice pocket money.
    > >
    > > When the customer ruins their machine again I do it all over again and
    > > charge the same money.
    > >
    >
    > You must move at light speed, have a very fast Internet connection, some way
    > of temporarily overclocking the customer's pc, and spend a lot of time
    > maintaining a very large collection of drivers and slipstreamed Windows
    > CD's. On a normal XP machine say a P4 2.0 GHz, 512 MB ram, PATA hard drive,
    > ATI or Nvdia graphics it takes at least 1 1/2 hours just to install
    > Windows, install the latest drivers, download Windows updates and install an
    > antivirus. Add anything unusual or a lesser machine (say a Celeron or Duron
    > with 256 MB) in the mix and it will take longer. This doesn't include
    > backing up then restoring their data. A typical customer has at least 5 to
    > 10 GB of data they want saved. To be safe you should actually take an image
    > of their current system which is likely to be greater than 20 GB. If the pc
    > doesn't have USB 2.0 or firewire the backup process will be slow. You would
    > have to backup via LAN, USB 1.1 or open the case and install another drive.
    > If they have Office or any other significant apps to reinstall it will take
    > longer again. I charge two hours to do what you claim to do in 1 1/2. It
    > usually takes around three to do it properly but two is the going rate. The
    > saving grace is a lot of time while Windows is installing can be spent
    > working on another machine. I'm not saying it can't be done in 1 1/2 hours.
    > I have done it on fairly simple configurations.I am saying it usually takes
    > around double that to do the job properly. Some comments from others would
    > be good. Maybe I'm being too picky and/or doing more work than normal.
    >
    > Kerry
    >
    > > "Leythos" wrote:
    > >
    > >> Most of us the worked on computers for a living have run across many
    > >> compromised computers with many different types of malware.
    > >>
    > >> As people post with compromised machines we direct them to all of the
    > >> tools that we know about in an effort to help them regain use of their
    > >> machines in a malware free mode, or at least enough access to backup
    > >> their documents and files to restore later.
    > >>
    > >> What is really at question is the ability of the current tools we have
    > >> to clean 100% of the malware 100% of the time in the current and future
    > >> environment for a givem machine at a given instant.
    > >>
    > >> This thread is not personal, about anyone's skills, about any
    > >> individual, it's only about cleaning malware off machines to the point
    > >> that we could state that 100% of all malware, known and unknown, is
    > >> removed from the machine at the moment you finish cleaning it.
    > >>
    > >> Do you feel 100% certain that your tools and skills can clean a
    > >> compromised machine, 100% of the time, without any malware, known or
    > >> unknow, remaining on the machine - 100% of the time?
    > >>
    > >> Since I don't believe that any one can actually say "YES" without
    > >> limitations, then how do we help all of these clueless users ensure
    > >> their machines are clean?
    > >>
    > >> We all know that you can wipe/reboot/install from clean disks, in a
    > >> clean environment, and the machine will be clean at that moment.
    > >>
    > >> We all know that it takes between 30~90 minutes to restore a machine
    > >> from scratch (depending on the method, quicker for ghost images), and
    > >> that it's time consuming to get everything back to normal for customers.
    > >>
    > >> We all know that no one wants to wipe/reinstall as it means lots of
    > >> extra work.
    > >>
    > >> Now, we also know that removing the malware can take hours in some
    > >> cases, most takes less. For some malware you have to boot to the
    > >> recovery console and manually remove it.
    > >>
    > >> So, it comes down to this - clean their system enough to save files to
    > >> CD/DVD, then wipe it to ensure that the malware is 100% removed and the
    > >> system is clean enough to be certified as clean.
    > >>
    > >> While most of us will just clean a machine and reboot it several times,
    > >> check the registry, tasks, netstat, etc.... then run the malware removal
    > >> tools several times, etc... It just means that we're willing to take the
    > >> level of risk for not having to put the time in to ensure that the
    > >> system is 100% certified clean, which means we don't really want to
    > >> reinstall everything again :)
    > >>
    > >> I know that some will claim they can perfectly clean a machine, but, if
    > >> you're really that sure you can clean 100% of malware, 100% of the time,
    > >> now and in the future, of known and unknown malware, without a
    > >> wipe/reinstall, then I think you're just fooling yourself.
    > >>
    > >> Again, are we assuming that by providing "reactionary" tools and methods
    > >> that don't wipe/reinstall, that we're doing visitors to this group (and
    > >> others) justice and actually providing them with a 100% clean platform
    > >> to continue with?
    > >>
    > >> --
    > >>
    > >> spam999free@rrohio.com
    > >> remove 999 in order to email me
    > >>
    >
    >
    >


  • Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Can you really 100% clean a compromised machine 100% of the ti"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 2 SATA drives and 1 IDE drive Not Recognized
      ... I tried to install the motherboard driver utility from the original CD- ... ROM within Windows. ... LifeGuard to find out if it sees the drives. ... Then just update the drivers if newer versions are available on the web site ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: 2 SATA drives and 1 IDE drive Not Recognized
      ... I tried to install the motherboard driver utility from the original CD- ... ROM within Windows. ... LifeGuard to find out if it sees the drives. ... Then just update the drivers if newer versions are available on the web site ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: 2 SATA drives and 1 IDE drive Not Recognized
      ... I tried to install the motherboard driver utility from the original CD- ... ROM within Windows. ... LifeGuard to find out if it sees the drives. ... Then just update the drivers if newer versions are available on the web site ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Cant find proper XP drivers
      ... I really *do* have a problem installing drivers. ... > little experience with Windows, and I'm used to Linux, which supports ... > The first time, the shop didn't even bother to install Firefox, so the ... > yadda yadda probably some data loss yadda yadda tell M$ about this ...
      (alt.os.windows-xp)
    • Re: Windows 7
      ... If I buy a new hard drive can I install it onto that and will my ... their customer base to no good end. ... The worst of all this exercise in making windows appeal to the Apple ... Looking at all the cockameemee default settings of a freshly installed ...
      (uk.comp.homebuilt)