Re: learning security & priviledges

From: Galen (galennews_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/09/05 

Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:16:48 -0500

In news:1131542701.082223.46450@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
rarewolf <rarewolf@gmail.com> had this to say:

 My reply is at the bottom of your sent message:

> I'm hoping someone can point me to a website for learning directory &
> file security & priviledges. Foe example ... I have a 'central' file
> sharing computer that ('A') is used in the context of local and domain
> logons. Another computer ('B'), hard-NIC'd to this computer creates
> files on 'A', and in users' directories, but 'B" can only have a
> single logon. Therefore, I have one "general user" ('B') writing
> files to many directories, which are associated with individual
> users. Ideally, individuals should have full control of their
> directory and offspring, but not to others' directories.
>
> I seem to have it almost done, but subdirectories and files are being
> created that do not necessarily carry the parent directory's
> priviledges, and the options for inheritance are somewhat confusing at
> the dialog box.
>
> TIA & cheerios :)

This may seem sarcastic but it's not meant to be. The first three links are
gems:

http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=site:support.microsoft.com+file+permissions+windows+xp&FORM=MSRE 

-- 
Galen - MS MVP - Windows (Shell/User & IE)
http://dts-l.org/
Please note that if you're reading this in a browser and the domain is
not owned by Microsoft then this work is being used without permission.
Access MS Newsgroups :
http://kgiii.info/windows/all/general/msnewsgroups.html

Relevant Pages

  • Re: List etiquette question
    ... In a 1:1 simple mail exchange top/ bottom it does not matter as long ... messages often apply to this specific context. ... posting works well. ... I know that "famous name" posters bottom posts and when I read the ...
    (Fedora)
  • Top & Bottom posting vs Netiquette [was Re: CM8738 On-Board Sound Problems (Works...mostly....mo
    ... >]In the English speaking world we read left to right, top to bottom. ... but they do *not* give you the context of a Top-Posted remark. ... >Top posting is far more polite many times than is bottom posting. ... material is stored in the drawer that contains other related items. ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: Got to laugh
    ... >> The full context, should I wish to read it, is in the previous post. ... > be there, in order, top to bottom, for any of it to make sense. ... > Top posting gives the best of all worlds. ... > don't get forced to scroll "like a dummy" to the bottom of the message to ...
    (uk.rec.audio)
  • Re: Chuck Falconer top posting again
    ... a presentation at the bottom of the context. ... good luck explaining the concept of brain usage to the posting ... I found two additional posts ... Top posting in this context means that the thread ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Got to laugh
    ... > The full context, should I wish to read it, is in the previous post. ... Wally, you can't have it both ways (not you specifically, I mean the bottom ... Top posting gives the best of all worlds. ... don't have to scroll past it, yes you can leave the whole of what has gone ...
    (uk.rec.audio)