Re: Changing the Administrator's password

From: Shenan Stanley (newshelper_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/27/05


Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:25:07 -0500

Jerry wrote:
> The size of the hard drive DOES impact whether you are able to use
> NTFS or if you have to use FAT. 8 Gigabyte hard drives are not able
> to use NTFS (for some reason 8 gigs seems to be the cut-off
> point...larger drives are able to use NTFS) ... we are warned about
> that during XP installation and the system will not allow you to
> convert from FAT to NFS after the OS is installed. I know because I
> tried to.
>
> I bought a comprehensive manual put out by Microsoft ... hardcover, so
> it set me back a touch ... and the instructions in it apply to people
> who have NTFS...leaves me sort of out in the cold as I'm stuck with
> FAT32. Some of the things in there apply to me, but a lot don't and
> it leaves me in the lurch when I have questions.
>
> I did log on as the Administrator and changed the password from the
> Contol Panel's User Account section...I kept getting error messages
> even tho the first change I made actually went thru. I kept getting
> error messages afterward because I kept inputting the old password
> thinking that it had not been changed already.
>
> You gave a lot of information on this post and I thankyou for the time
> and effort you put into it. I really appreciate it Shenan.

Hmm.. I think you have misunderstood something you read somewhere.

I have formatted drives smaller than 8GB NTFS for a long time. 4GB was the
smallest.. Although I really had to strip down Windows XP to do it.

You should have no problem - if you have enough space on your really small
drive - converting to NTFS. With a drive that small - I wouldn't take a
chance and probably make an image of it with Ghost or something first - but
I bet you could convert it to NTFS pretty easily.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/convertfat.mspx

However, because you would be converting instead of installing - there are
other issues (like cluster size) to contend with. It would be better to do
a fresh install and format it NTFS. heh

-- 
Shenan Stanley
     MS-MVP
-- 
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html 


Relevant Pages

  • Glitches with FC3
    ... since the installation did not detect and mount them. ... drives and the linux partitions - which is what I really need the help with. ... the ntfs partition - though it appears in Gnome under the Computer ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Re: Safely Remove External Drive
    ... You are correct in that FAT and NTS volumes are treated slightly differently. ... it does effectively turn off write-caching. ... For NTFS, it changes the behavior but doesn't totally turn off the cache. ... main performance inpact on flash drives because on flash drives ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Multiple Hard Drives, various Partitions?
    ... You'll find a good article called "Choosing between NTFS, FAT, and FAT32". ... Has very limited constraints on file size as well as partition size. ... All of my internal drives are NTFS, so I'm not sure how XP ... Maybe format them NTFS for the reason that the NTFS file ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • [opensuse] Re: ntfs write; future of FAT32: FAT40/48/64? Other FS?
    ... It provides full ntfs read/write. ... Is this one of the drivers that runs MS-NTFS drivers in a ... I have not noticed our large drives being particularly slow. ... With a 32-bit FAT, all full, that would take what -- (assuming signed ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Optimal place for pagefile.sys
    ... NTFS is at best 1-2%. ... programs and windows move visiblely faster from ... All rest is on storage partition. ... >> | course, in the case of several hard drives, it would be better to place ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)