Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
From: Tom (noway_at_nothere.com)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Previous message: Danor: "Power User Accts: strange behaviours"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:11:38 -0500
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.21.23.01.57.441042@nowhere.lan...
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:30:36 +0100, Alias wrote:
>
>>> The information doesn't provide that the US is a breading ground for
>>> criminals, the information doesn't show anything of the sort - but, like
>>> your inability to see that resellers are responsible for the marketing
>>> information they provide to customers, I don't expect you to understand
>>> that either.
>>
>> OK, are you willing to visit South Central LA? Do you need a Google
>> search
>> to figure that one out? How about N.E. Washington, D.C, the murder
>> capital
>> of the world?
>
> Actually, I've walked the streets at night in all of those locations in
> the last couple years, and never had a problem in any of them - even
> alone.
>
>>> Just how did George "steal" the election?
>>
>> Electronic voting machines that left no paper trail. You aren't up on the
>> news, are you? You must spend too much time on this newsgroup I guess.
>
> And you spend to much time believing conspiracy theories and other FUD.
> There was never a paper trail with paper ballots - it just looked like
> there was.
>
> As a registered independent I
> don't see where there were any real problems with the voting. The only
> problem I have is that Kerry lied about his service, lied about
> everything, and that the media still backed him.
Ah, you were sold on the "Swift Boat Veterans" ads eh, LMAO!
>> Lying about WMDs and getting almost 2000 young Americans killed invading
>> a
>> country that posed no threat is OK by you? Do you want the cowboy to
>> attack
>> Iran, Syria and North Korea too?
>
> He didn't lie, in fact, if you look at the satellite images of all the
> trucks leaving suspected areas and going to Syria you might learn
> something - we did give them 30 days to move/hide everything. And you
> don't consider saving the millions from being tortured/killed by Saddam
> and his minions to be something worth doing?
Really? Where was this concern of removing that tyrant when he ACTUALLY
possessed WMDs, and used them on Iran, and his own citizens, while still
having enough fire power to invade other countries?? Funny the concern is
only now. Oh, and by the way, it was determined during the congressional
hearings that Iraq WASN'T a training ground for terrorists (no more than is
in Saudi Arabia, etals), that there was no found connection to Al-Qaeda. And
many (seemingly other sheep like you) believed Iraq and Saddam were tied to
9/11, but they weren't as was ADMITTED by Cheney.
Also, don't you find it odd the first thing they protected in Baghdad, was
the Oil Ministry, while stockpiles of grenade/rocktet launchers, and hand
weapon galore went into the hands of the insurgents.. It was about OIL, not
removing a tyrant, because we sure didn't deploy the needed amount of men
and logistics to go after Osama in Afghanistan, where the 9/11 perps
actually resided, and still do (or in Pakistan).
>You don't consider that Iraq
> was used as a training base for many terrorists to be a threat to Spain or
> any other country - did you forget about all the terrorist acts outside
> the USA over the last 20 years?
LOL, ever see those images of Rumsfeld shaking thr hand of Saddam (less than
19 years ago), while Iraq was at war with the USA's enemy du jour, Iran, and
the logistics and weapons we sold them?
>
> I would love to see Syria and North Korea fall, but I'm actually more
> worried about China than those two.
I'd be more worried about you, and the paranoids running D.C. now.
>
> And still you don't blame WalMart for screwing customers over on their
> failure to tell customers they are purchasing a License for installation
> on ONE computer...
Did MS license their software to Walmart?
- Next message: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Previous message: Danor: "Power User Accts: strange behaviours"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|