Re: EFS - Please help to unsecure data
From: Richard Urban (richardurbanREMOVETHIS_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: Dave: "Re: am i going blind"
- Previous message: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: am i going blind"
- In reply to: Galen: "Re: EFS - Please help to unsecure data"
- Next in thread: - 781: "Re: EFS - Please help to unsecure data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:01:21 -0500
When 64 bit encryption was introduced there were world wide contests
offering a great amount of money for anyone who could crack the code. I
believe, but am not certain, it took almost a year before anyone was
successful. They had many hundreds of linked computers (similar to
seti@Home) applying a brute force attack.
There was another contest when 128 encryption was introduced. I don't
believe the prize was ever claimed!
-- Regards, Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Galen" <galennews@gmail.com> wrote in message news:uvAyXJLDFHA.1836@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > In news:egbnOOIDFHA.2232@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl, > Torgeir Bakken (MVP) <Torgeir.Bakken-spam@hydro.com> had this to say: > >> Take a look at this site for more details: >> >> http://www.beginningtoseethelight.org/efsrecovery/ > > I want to thank you for the link. I've never encountered this problem, as > I'd mentioned, because the only time(s) I've encrypted any data were just > to > educate myself on the process. At that time, with recommendations made in > the DTS group if I recall though it might have been during or after one of > the expert chats, I believe I went through the key backup process as well. > However, the files were simply plain text files or a couple of > non-important > executables and were eventually deleted. No loss of data and it never > occured that I might lose the keys to open them as I had no intention of > keeping the files. > > I'm generally one that believes that there's no such thing as something > that > can't really be done if one tries enough. It is my theory at this time > that > there's some chance at getting these files open with minimal expenditure. > Each attempt, I'm afraid, is going to be unique and the results will vary > based on the amount of data over-written during any fresh installations of > the operating system, file deletion, and any normal disk activity. > > My guess, and I'm wanting to emphasise that this is a guess at this point, > is that data recovery software (there's actually a decent freeware version > kicking about which I can dig up if anyone else is interested but I have > some paid software here that will be what I'm working with) could be used > to > recover some or all of the keys from the profile data. I'm not sure if I > understand correctly but: > > "The program can decrypt protected files only if encryption keys (at > least, > some of them) are still exist in the system and have not been tampered." > > -Jupiter Jones (from the readme.txt file) > > Which makes me believe that only a portion of the key(s) would be > required? > While it's unlikely that all the keys would be recovered with forensic > tools > available after a re-installation of the OS and various usage of the hard > drive it's possible that some of them would be recovered. > > This leads to my next question which is how about a brute force? I took a > look at Microsoft's position on this and though the information is > specifically for 2k I'm guessing that it's still very much valid for XP. > > Their response to this is: > > "Syskey thwarts this attack by encrypting the SAM database using strong > encryption. Even if an attacker did manage to obtain a copy of the > Syskey-protected SAM, he would first need to conduct a brute-force attack > to > determine the Syskey, then conduct a brute-force attack against the hashes > themselves. This dramatically increases the work factor associated with > the > attack, to the point where it's considered to be computationally > infeasible." > From: > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/security/news/efs.mspx > > My idea at this point is to install XP Pro as an NTFS install and create a > few encrypted files on a partitioned drive (just to make sure that I don't > need to try to recover those as well.) Using a second operating system > (perhaps a *NIX on CD) I'll delete various system files and folders to > insure that the OS no longer functions. The next step would be to format > the > drive, complete as opposed to quick just to make it the 'worst case > scenario' that I can think of. Then I'll probably do it a second time to > insure that I've given the drive a good chance at writting over any > sectors > that it wants to though I may just copy over a couple of large files and > delete them and delete them from the recycle bin to futher perform 'disk > writting' in hopes of mimiking typical activity. The next step would be to > try for data recovery and if required to use a variety of tools. Perhaps > from outside of the OS? Following that the next step would be to try one > of > the various tools to recover the file. > > Here's another example of an EFS recovery tool in which they claim that > only > the password must be known (or a SAM database present) that MAY be of > interest? I haven't downloaded this yet but I've read the information that > they have available on the site. > > http://www.lostpassword.com/efs.htm > > Anyhow, on with the subject... What are the opinions of the testing > methods? > Do you see any steps that I should add to this testing? Has anyone given > this a shot? Perhaps I should do it with something important as it would > increase my incentive to succeed... On second thought... No... But it's an > interesting idea :) > > Galen > -- > > "My mind rebels at stagnation. Give me problems, give me work, give me > the most abstruse cryptogram or the most intricate analysis, and I am > in my own proper atmosphere. I can dispense then with artificial > stimulants. But I abhor the dull routine of existence. I crave for > mental exaltation." -- Sherlock Holmes > >
- Next message: Dave: "Re: am i going blind"
- Previous message: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: am i going blind"
- In reply to: Galen: "Re: EFS - Please help to unsecure data"
- Next in thread: - 781: "Re: EFS - Please help to unsecure data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|