Re: this is why its good to deactivate ...
From: Cyber-Hun (th54_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: Mike Hall: "Re: Norton Internet Security 2005 - slows down computer??"
- Previous message: Cyber-Hun: "Re: Worm never seen before"
- In reply to: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Next in thread: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Reply: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:57:02 GMT
Sorry, it was in relation to "Worm never seen before " by I.L.S., I had the
focus on the wrong thing. I reposted it.
"Gordon" <gordonbp1@yahoo.invalid> wrote in message
news:et6eA5y7EHA.3076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Pankyscig wrote:
>> Seems this exploit needed the attack surface created by the service
>> running on port 445, this is why it's good to shut these services
>> down in addition to blocking to blocking the incoming port 445
>> traffuc with a router. Especially if you're just running a
>> standalone, home system that doesn't need to talk to other domain
>> members.
>
> Who are you talking to and about what? Please quote the post you are
> replying to.
>
> Thank you.
>
- Next message: Mike Hall: "Re: Norton Internet Security 2005 - slows down computer??"
- Previous message: Cyber-Hun: "Re: Worm never seen before"
- In reply to: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Next in thread: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Reply: Gordon: "Re: this is why its good to deactivate ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|