Re: Travelling laptops over VPN

From: Bill Sanderson (Bill_Sanderson_at_msn.com.plugh.org)
Date: 11/30/04


Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:28:15 -0500

Here's one discussion of some of the security issues around this setting,
and also some recommendations which primarily relate to the host end of the
VPN tunnel, unfortunately:

http://www.isaserver.org/tutorials/VPN_Client_Security_Issues.html

This link:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/dnsbf_vpn_yvjp.asp

has a brief discussion of security issues of split tunneling, and notes that
a packet filter restricting traffic over the VPN connection to packets
originating from the remote access clients (i.e. not from the client's
Internet connection)--is a default configuration in Windows Server 2003.

This link (a PDF, unfortunately) discusses, with references to Shinder, the
possibility of a session hijack when split tunneling is used.

http://www.teleworkconsortium.org/Theory_and_Practice/whitepapers/BroadbandSecurityPaperCSC.pdf

So--the two vulnerabilities introduced by split tunneling are 1) the
possibility of routing between the insecure Internet and the secure private
network via the split-tunneling client machine, and 2) the possibility of a
session hijack of the client machine, with consequent disclosure of private
corporate data.

As with other security issues, each admin needs to assess their own risk
tolerance level and make a decision about what policies are appropriate for
their environment.

(and you, and probably most reading this thread, are probably more aware of
these issues than I am--but I thought I'd try to dig out some clear
references to precisely what the risks are. I think I've got the technical
risks clearly laid out, but without much clear information about how to
quantify those risks, I'm afraid.)

"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:u60Kgzx1EHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "Jerry" <jerry.giacinto@ketteng.com.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:%238lynpw1EHA.132@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Well, you brought up the exact situation I'm faced with: we are using
>> split-tunneling. I've been told by Cisco that without split-tunneling, a
>> client cannot browse the internet while connected to the VPN. This
> doesn't
>> seem correct to me, so I may have to ask another tech at Cisco.
>
> Don't bother. He is exactly correct. You must use Split Tunneling to be
> able
> to use the VPN and use the Internet independently from each other.
>
>> We do have a robust, multi-layered AV defense, so I'm not as worried
> about
>> that. But you're correct that I'm not sure how much of a threat I'm
>> faced
>> with if I don't have a properly established firewall. Do you have other
>> suggestions for testing the effectiveness of a firewall, or do you think
>> that what I'm doing with Nmap might be sufficient?
>
> AV software and Browser Security set to the "highest" is the best defence.
> As far as personal firewalls,...well I'm so excited about them that I
> don't
> even run one... :-) I follow the measures I already mentioned and I
> don't
> have things running on any directly exposed machine that I don't want
> soemone connecting to. I just simply keep my machines "clean",..I know
> what
> I have running on them,..and why.
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Travelling laptops over VPN
    ... Here's one discussion of some of the security issues around this setting, ... VPN tunnel, unfortunately: ... possibility of a session hijack when split tunneling is used. ... references to precisely what the risks are. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
  • Re: Routing Morpheus through AOL
    ... Doesn't AOL provide its own internally tunnelled connection? ... Considering this group is supposed to be for network ... and security issues. ... tunneling mechanisms, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Tool to find hidden web proxy server
    ... >> What's happening in your LAN is called firewall tunneling of firewall ... >> from outside your LAN. ... second level of security over what the original poster said it had. ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Re: Split Tunneling in the Windows VPN Client???
    ... There is not necessarily a "reason" for tunneling all packets including local ... Home user with home network with multiple computers (not uncommon nowdays ... Dad leaves for a couple hours but forgets to disconnect his VPN connection ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Hoe secure is openvpn in Linux?
    ... but what sort of extra security does VPN ... > tunneling actually add? ... I guess you don't need it if you only want to connect a single Linux ...
    (sci.crypt)