Re: Help Microsoft define the next Windows Certificate Server

From: Fei Chua (feichua_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/16/04 

Date: 15 Oct 2004 17:00:47 -0700

Hi, this is Fei again,

I want to thank folks who sent us feedback. We appreciate that very
much! I have sent acknowledgements your feature requests and we are
actively working on getting those features into the next version of
the certificate server.

For those who doubt the authenticity of my original post from
feichua@nospam.hotmail.com/feichua@nospam.microsoft.com, I encourage
you to email me at the MS address. That will solve the mystery once
and for all. I do apologize for not replying to the newgroup earlier.
And BTW, I use Google Groups instead of a standard news reader because
I like its searching and capability. Sorry if that confuses people.

Once again. Thank you very much! Looking forward to working with you
again soon.

-Fei Chua
Microsoft PKI Program Manager

"Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikebran@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<uyBrTWNqEHA.3744@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>...
> "rusga" <reply2newsgroup@nntp> wrote in message
> news:opse7q0nvyeqwqha@207.46.248.16...
> >I think they did... where's Fei?
> >
>
> Fei's waiting for the responses he asked for.
> There is no requirement for him to post again here as he had made his
> request and is now dealing with the responses.
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
> --
> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights
>
> Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
> newsgroups
>
> "rusga" <reply2newsgroup@nntp> wrote in message
> news:opse7q0nvyeqwqha@207.46.248.16...
> >I think they did... where's Fei?
> >
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:33:14 +0100, Willk <not.given@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Vanguardx" <see_signature> wrote in message
> >> news:ON3uOyKqEHA.3760@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >>> "Willk" <not.given@hotmail.com>
> >>> wrote in news:415ea7aa$0$73245$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com:
> >>>>
> >>>> I for one, can not see the reason for an 'impersonator' to make that
> >>>> post (allthough I notice it was crossposted). Agreed, you should not
> >>>> take everything on face value in the newsgroups but the content of
> >>>> the original post, I feel did not warrant such a reply.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Why do a-holes post lists of legitimate e-mail addresses in usenet
> >>> posts?
> >>> To get those recipients slammed with spam and infected e-mails. Same
> >>> could
> >>> hold true for an imposter that wanted to deluge someone at Microsoft
> >>> while
> >>> also frustrating Microsoft's users. The Internet is full of pueriles.
> >>> Fei didn't have enough prior posts for readers to qualify that the post
> >>> was actually his, and with all the different non-Microsoft domains used
> >>> to
> >>> submit the post then it was a bit iffy that it was a valid post. If you
> >>> have ever received any phishing e-mails, you'll realize that a message
> >>> stylized as an official announcement doesn't make it so.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As far as phished emails go, most are very easy to spot for all but the
> >> most
> >> naive users. The idea that someone would try to impersonate a Microsoft
> >> employee at this level is quite frankly ridiculous.
> >>
> >> However, a cross-posted message (for example) asking for complaints
> >> toward
> >> Microsoft (to a valid MSFT recipient) may be feasible, and on these
> >> grounds
> >> I agree with your argument. With the Sender ID program in mind, perhaps
> >> Microsoft should reconsider their policy on making public statements via
> >> these channels.
> >>
> >>
> >

Quantcast