Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015
From: Peter (0spam0)
Date: 08/23/04
- Previous message: Avis Boreham: "Trojan Virus"
- In reply to: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Sunny: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:10:32 -0400
I give up. I don't see a "follow up to" option in OE anyway. Clicking
reply to group automatically replies to whatever group the original poster
used.
Case closed
-- Peter. Toronto, Canada. Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. "Al" <al@owll.com> wrote in message news:snnWc.24964$rP2.17324@hydra.nntpserver.com... Except that you replied to all the NGs also, which means you have them in your lists. Why not use the "Followup-To:" header ???" insert? Crossposting to 3 relevant groups is acceptable. "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message news:uNtDnZRiEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Your original post (if you clicked reply on it) would show multiple > newsgroup addresses were used, therefore any reply would automatically > cross > post too. I don't cross post myself, but if you want to then go ahead. > To me it's a waste of time and resources as these groups are busy enough. > > -- > Peter. > Toronto, Canada. > Windows XP Home SP2. > Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. > "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message > news:%23r44BQRiEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >>I replied to YOUR post thus the crossposting from me. So, your reply >>elicited my crosspost. >> >> >> "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message >> news:e4Bj5IRiEHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>> No problem really but MS might object to crossposting which I noticed >>> you >>> do, hence any answers are automatically posted to all groups too. It >>> just causes clutter that's all. >>> >>> -- >>> Peter. >>> Toronto, Canada. >>> Windows XP Home SP2. >>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. >>> "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message >>> news:%23NHdXGRiEHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>>> No idea. Why did you do it? >>>> >>>> >>>> "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message >>>> news:eZT4WRIiEHA.704@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >>>>> What is the point of posting in every single group?? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Peter. >>>>> Toronto, Canada. >>>>> Windows XP Home SP2. >>>>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. >>>>> "Leo Feret" <chessDELETEcanoe@excite.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:X23Wc.6238$dB6.1680@nwrddc03.gnilink.net... >>>>>> With SP2 firewall off, ZAP 5.0.590.043 and SP2 play well together. >>>>>> >>>>>> Interrogative wrote: >>>>>>> "IWB" <IBecker@prodigy.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:E60F15A9-AF56-4FEC-AC69-2332BBB8DB32@microsoft.com... >>>>>>>> I'm wondering about the new ZoneAlarm 5.1.011. Is it as bad as >>>>>>>> 5.0.590.015? >>>>>>>> Anyone other than ZA labs test it yet. what do any of you reccomend >>>>>>>> especially to some of us with subscriptions until 2005! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> New version of ZA - latest available - works like a charm even with >>>>>>> XPSP2 firewall set on. Never a problem with them. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Leo Feret - "I'm not always at the keyboard; >>>>>> ·|ΤΏΤ¬|· sometimes I use the trackball." >>>>>> ____________________________________________ >>>>>> "The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually >>>>>> fearing you will make one." >>>>>> - Elbert Hubbard >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
- Previous message: Avis Boreham: "Trojan Virus"
- In reply to: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Sunny: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|