Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015
From: Al (al_at_owll.com)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Fritz: "Re: Disabling windows update"
- Previous message: JS: "Disabling windows update"
- In reply to: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:42:31 -0400
Except that you replied to all the NGs also, which means you have them in your lists. Why not use the "Followup-To:" header ???" insert? Crossposting to 3 relevant groups is acceptable.
"Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message news:uNtDnZRiEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Your original post (if you clicked reply on it) would show multiple
> newsgroup addresses were used, therefore any reply would automatically cross
> post too. I don't cross post myself, but if you want to then go ahead.
> To me it's a waste of time and resources as these groups are busy enough.
>
> --
> Peter.
> Toronto, Canada.
> Windows XP Home SP2.
> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
> "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message
> news:%23r44BQRiEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>I replied to YOUR post thus the crossposting from me. So, your reply
>>elicited my crosspost.
>>
>>
>> "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
>> news:e4Bj5IRiEHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>> No problem really but MS might object to crossposting which I noticed you
>>> do, hence any answers are automatically posted to all groups too. It
>>> just causes clutter that's all.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peter.
>>> Toronto, Canada.
>>> Windows XP Home SP2.
>>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
>>> "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message
>>> news:%23NHdXGRiEHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>> No idea. Why did you do it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eZT4WRIiEHA.704@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>>> What is the point of posting in every single group??
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Peter.
>>>>> Toronto, Canada.
>>>>> Windows XP Home SP2.
>>>>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
>>>>> "Leo Feret" <chessDELETEcanoe@excite.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:X23Wc.6238$dB6.1680@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
>>>>>> With SP2 firewall off, ZAP 5.0.590.043 and SP2 play well together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interrogative wrote:
>>>>>>> "IWB" <IBecker@prodigy.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:E60F15A9-AF56-4FEC-AC69-2332BBB8DB32@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>>> I'm wondering about the new ZoneAlarm 5.1.011. Is it as bad as
>>>>>>>> 5.0.590.015?
>>>>>>>> Anyone other than ZA labs test it yet. what do any of you reccomend
>>>>>>>> especially to some of us with subscriptions until 2005!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New version of ZA - latest available - works like a charm even with
>>>>>>> XPSP2 firewall set on. Never a problem with them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Leo Feret - "I'm not always at the keyboard;
>>>>>> ·|ΤΏΤ¬|· sometimes I use the trackball."
>>>>>> ____________________________________________
>>>>>> "The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually
>>>>>> fearing you will make one."
>>>>>> - Elbert Hubbard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Fritz: "Re: Disabling windows update"
- Previous message: JS: "Disabling windows update"
- In reply to: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Peter: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
