Re: firewall
From: Crusty \ (B_at_stard\)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: MSCanuck: "User Profiles"
- Previous message: Wesley Vogel: "Re: Secure Delivery Plug In"
- In reply to: Bruce Chambers: "Re: firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:33:21 -0400
Agreed! Agreed! Agreed!
On 90% of the computers I work on, the scumware has been placed there by the
computer owners themselves, usually when installing "FREE" software or
downloading from a site such as Kazaa! Also, when they visit porno sites and
download the mandatory "free" viewer they are infected with dialer programs
and all sorts of web page redirects.
For those who don't know! Windows XP is perfectly capable of displaying
almost any graphic or video. If you are told you *need* a viewer, from an
obviously dubious web site, leave the web site. You don't want their viewer!
Get the standard extra viewers from the manufacturers web sites, such as the
Real Player or Quick Time viewer.
-- Regards: Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) "Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message news:uP5Up4wdEHA.3988@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Greetings -- > > Like WinXP's firewall, NAT-capable routers do nothing to protect > the user from him/herself. Again -- and I _cannot_ emphasize this > enough -- almost all spyware and many Trojans and worms are downloaded > and installed deliberately (albeit unknowingly) by the user. So a > software firewall, such as Sygate or ZoneAlarm, that can detect and > warn the user of unauthorized out-going traffic is an important > element of protecting one's privacy and security. Most antivirus > applications do not scan for or protect you from adware/spyware, > because, after all, you've installed them yourself, so you must want > them there, right? > > I use both a router with NAT and Sygate Personal Firewall, even > though I generally know better than to install scumware. When it > comes to computer security and protecting my privacy, I prefer the old > "belt and suspenders" approach. > > > Bruce Chambers > -- > Help us help you: > http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on > having both at once. - RAH > > > "belgrave" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:7c1801c476d9$852ebcb0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >> i recently purchased netgear firewall router DG834G.as >> this one has in built firewall,do i still need to use >> windows firewall?.are there likely any problems using >> both?. >> thanks > >
- Next message: MSCanuck: "User Profiles"
- Previous message: Wesley Vogel: "Re: Secure Delivery Plug In"
- In reply to: Bruce Chambers: "Re: firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
