Re: SP2 Firewall
From: Bruce Chambers (bchambers_at_nospamcableone.net)
Date: 06/27/04
- Previous message: Bob Byrne: "SP2 Firewall"
- In reply to: Bob Byrne: "SP2 Firewall"
- Next in thread: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: SP2 Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:18:15 -0600
Greetings --
The "next generation" Windows Firewall included with SP2, while
vastly superior to the original ICF in terms of visibility, usability
and configurability, is still rather lacking, as a solid security
component. It still can't supplant 3rd-party solutions, nor is it
intended to do so; rather, it's intended to complement them. And, like
the original ICF, it will not monitor out-going traffic.
It's most important virtues, I think, are it's improved
compatibility with internal LANs and its configurability via group
policies. Now, there's a simple, cheap tool that system admins can
use to protect the LAN workstations from that occasional - but not
rare enough - fool who manages to bypass the perimeter firewall and
manually install some malware that could then spread throughout the
LAN via shared drives.
Bruce Chambers
-- Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - RAH "Bob Byrne" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:%23EFjYz$WEHA.1036@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Hi, > My ZA Pro service expires in about a month and I'm reluctant to renew as > lately the updates have been very buggy on my system. > I'm contemplating going with the new version of WinXP's firewall when SP2 > arrives. > Anyone using RC2 at the moment that can comment, I'd appreciate it. > > -- > Regards, Bob > >
- Previous message: Bob Byrne: "SP2 Firewall"
- In reply to: Bob Byrne: "SP2 Firewall"
- Next in thread: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: SP2 Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|