Re: XP Firewall efficiency
From: Testy (fraudbuster_at_canoemail.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: cquirke (MVP Win9x): "Re: XP Less Secure than 98 for Sharing Files"
- Previous message: Jeff Smyrski: "Elevated Priv"
- In reply to: peter_at_ntl.com: "XP Firewall efficiency"
- Next in thread: Bruce Chambers: "Re: XP Firewall efficiency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:34:40 -0400
Norton's one and only goal is to sell you their crappy software.
Testy
<peter@ntl.com> wrote in message
news:5f6901c42e03$ffce3460$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> I switched to a Windows XP system about 3 months ago and
> have installed all Windows Critical Updates since then. I
> have enabled the XP Firewall, but on doing a Symantec
> (Norton) Security Scan today the latter says I have a
> Hacker Response Risk. Looking at their details, there
> were about 3 items shown as open to risk of hacking. How
> can this be when I have enabled XP Firewall (I double-
> checked this!). Do I ignore Norton, or disenable XP
> Firewall and switch to Norton or other Firewall? Help
> please!
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.672 / Virus Database: 434 - Release Date: 4/28/2004
- Next message: cquirke (MVP Win9x): "Re: XP Less Secure than 98 for Sharing Files"
- Previous message: Jeff Smyrski: "Elevated Priv"
- In reply to: peter_at_ntl.com: "XP Firewall efficiency"
- Next in thread: Bruce Chambers: "Re: XP Firewall efficiency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
