Re: Is it true?

From: James Martin (martin)
Date: 01/21/04


Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:39:39 -0500

No problem, I was just giving you a hard time because your reply struck me
as funny. (In a corporate kinda way) :)

"Paul [MSFT]" <pauly@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23OE8pb83DHA.1992@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl...
>
> Hi James,
>
> Regarding your post:
>
> --------------------
> | From: "James Martin" <martin 426 At yahoo>
> | Subject: Re: Is it true?
> | Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:09:08 -0500
> |
> | No offense Paul, but that was a doublespeak event of Orwellian
> proportions.
> | Post a reply to say you can't reply.
> |
> | To Answer PEGcapital's question, Microsoft will include many new
features
> in
> | their products, and you *will* like them. Rest assured. However, you
> | should be very nervous about the trusted computing initiatives that many
> | companies are itching for.
>
> At the risk of the even more "double-speak" let me clarify my reason for
> posting the reply .
>
> People often ask for specifics on features in the next release. The
> original poster wanted very specific details including a confirmation on
if
> the feature would be included in the Word interface.
>
> As a rule Microsoft will not confim. However, if Microsoft were to ignore
> every such question with not even an acknoledgement that we saw the post,
> it would be even more frustrating to the poster.
>
> While Microsoft maintains a long-standing policy of not commenting on
> features in unreleased products, we have remind people of this fact
> occasionally to let them know that we are listening to them, not ignoring
> them, and also to remind others who read posts in a public forum that if
> such questions are asked (future features) they will not recieve
> confirmation from Microsoft in that forum. Hopefully this achieves two
> things:
>
> 1. Lets people know that we are in the communities and do care about what
> people are discussing and
> 2. Occasionally reminding people that they should not expect to get
> confirmation on questions that have been and continue to be out-of-bounds.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Paul Hayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =========
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
> Windows XP Security Homepage:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/security/default.asp
>
> Windows 2000 Security Homepage:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/security/default.asp
>
> Top 10 Windows Newsgroups Security Questions:
>
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/newsgroups/default.asp?url=/technet/newsgro
> ups/nodepages/sectop10.asp
>
> =========
> Paul Hayes, MCSE
> Product Support Services
> Microsoft Corporation
> pauly@online.microsoft.com
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: spyware question
    ... If one has immunzation features, the entry it puts in might be considered ... Microsoft has these suggestions for Protecting your computer from the ... More full function applications for CD/DVD burning would be: ... using Windows XP "prettifications". ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: [News] VPC 7 lacks planned features
    ... I have to agree with most of this griping about Microsoft. ... effort into this thing to get the features discussed into the product NOW. ... > Native Graphics Card Support ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.virtualpc)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft
    ... with Microsoft, testifies that he never heard of the refund clause of the ... >> features the font hack was one of the features. ... Microsoft EULAs are often more absurd than this. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: "stored usernames and passwords" dialog, "Add" button missing
    ... Media Center is not considered a business product, by Microsoft. ... So it makes sense that they remove some of the "business related" features, expecially considering that it is cheaper than XP Pro. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: Problem sending mail merge fax in xp
    ... neglected "features" Microsoft has ever tried to offer. ... Microsoft needs to decide whether to abandon fax merge completely to third ... what am I missing in faxing with graphics? ... > permission to use Outlook, then asking for permission for EVERY SINGLE ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook.fax)