Re: security patch

From: Dingus Q. Squatford (awhiner_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/04/03

  • Next message: KPT: "Corrupt LSASS.EXE file?"
    Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 17:27:40 -0500
    
    

    I have noticed some users in this group reporting problems downloading
    Security patch 823980, and problems once the patch was finally installed. On
    July 18, 2003, I downloaded the patch 823980 (also 821577, 817606, and
    823559). One or more of these had to be downloaded 2 or 3 times because of
    installation failures, which I found unusual for Windows Update. The next
    morning I could not connect to the Internet via dialup. Modem diagnostics
    reported that "The port the modem is using is currently open by another
    application..." which could not have been true as nothing else was running.
    I rebooted and the modem worked, but continued to work only intermittently.
    I uninstalled the patches and restored the system to the July 17 checkpoint
    state. The modem returned to normal functioning. However, the next day I
    found that my Seiko Smart Label Printer 220, which connects to the computer
    via serial port, refused to function. With the help of a Seiko tech, I
    discovered that all com ports but com 1 had been wiped out, and since the
    modem uses com 1 and won't share it, I had to reenable com 2 in BIOS to get
    the printer working again. I attribute all this mayhem to one or more of the
    aforementioned security patches (or possibly to the fact that they failed to
    install at first), and I am reluctant to apply them again. It seems Cyndy
    had a similar problem. My OS: Windows XP Home ver. 2002, SP 1.
    Dingus
    "cyndy" <genehicks@cox.net> wrote in message
    news:0d1401c3584a$66837020$a501280a@phx.gbl...
    > I am hesitant to install the new patch as we tried it
    > before and could no longer get on our Internet site. I
    > had to completely remove the patch and do a system
    > restore. Is the new patch "fixed" or is this another
    > Microsoft "quickie" to appease the National News about
    > hacking? We "regular" folks who are not techies have no
    > idea whom to trust about updates from Microsoft!


  • Next message: KPT: "Corrupt LSASS.EXE file?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: virus patch for VPC
      ... I installed the AVG 6.0 ... > and they recommend to install this patch for security. ... Should I install this patch? ... Don't EVER run any kind of "security patch" that comes with email. ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.virtualpc)
    • virus patch for VPC
      ... I installed the AVG 6.0 ... I keep getting this MS security patch ... and they recommend to install this patch for security. ... Should I install this patch? ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.virtualpc)
    • MS03-026 patch installation
      ... And am planning to install it on one ... But want to know that If this patch gives some ... >trouble after installing it on the server, ... >I installed the security patch, Q823980i, on my web ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Video editing in Linux?
      ... Almost every MS patch I've had to ... >install on windows requires a reboot afterwards ... If you worked as a system administrator utilizing win2000 server you ... down the machine when a security patch is released, ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: [SLE] kernel update breaks pppd
      ... If I install from FTP ... > update the new kernel breaks pppd. ... a patch breaks pppd - as YOU ... Internet connection through modem in 9.1 is slow ...
      (SuSE)