Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?
From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu)
Date: 02/05/03
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: IIS authorization when logging in using FRONTPAGE"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Maybe in reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:14:43 -0700
7 char is too short for a crack resistant password.
-- Roger "Wayne Phillipw" <chaotos@nospam.net> wrote in message news:FIR_9.312$r84.34143@news.uswest.net... > I would like to thank everyone for their quick and informative replies! > > It sounds like my current setup would provide adequate security for my > purposes. I contains information I would not want anyone to see but it is > unlikely anyone would have a specific interest in breaking my encryption. > > I could make my password more complex. Right now it is only 7 characters but > has no recognizable words and uses both letters and symbols. > > "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu> wrote in message > news:##EQ4QfyCHA.2184@TK2MSFTNGP09... > > "Wayne Phillips" <chaotos@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:TcJ_9.98$63.111631@news.uswest.net... > > I have upgraded from W2K to XP on my laptop. The Boot Partion is fat32. I > > have a second NTFS partition. How secure are encrypted files on the NTFS > > partition should the laptop be stolen? > > > > I am nervous about converting the OS partiton to NTFS without reformating > > first and reinstalling XP, from what have read. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Whether the .\Documents and Setting and the .\Windows > are stored on FAT or NTFS does not make much difference > in this case. If they have physical control of the machine and > it can be booted from a floppy or CD they can slap a password > on an account and log in. However, that does not really much > matter (unless they slapped a password on the encrypting > account, in which case they have made it impossible for > them to get at the EFS files in the clear). In order to access > the EFS encrypted files they will need to log in with an > account identified in the encrypted files as allowed to > decrypt, and they must log in with the password that was > last in use by the account. For this they would have to > crack the SAM. You can prevent the crack attempts from > succeeding by using either smart cards or extremely long > and complex passwords (remember an XP password can > be something like 128 characters). Having the system and > profiles stored on FAT only makes one step (one that is > rather insignificant relative to getting at the EFS protected > files) in their process no longer necessary. > > -- > Roger Abell > MS MVP (Security, Windows), MCDBA, MCSE both > Associate Expert - Windows XP ExpertZone > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > >
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: IIS authorization when logging in using FRONTPAGE"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Maybe in reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|