Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?
From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu)
Date: 02/05/03
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: ISS maxconnections"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Maybe reply: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:13:58 -0700
The XP defragmenter is not all that effective.
You can control the block size used by and NTFS partition,
but I do not know how to do this for a conversion, only
for a fresh NTFS format. Anyway, it is always dicey trying
to guess what blocksize will be best for a general usage
partition. Ntfs does have greater overheads, but then it is
a much more feature-filled filesystem than FAT.
-- Roger "Wayne Phillipw" <chaotos@nospam.net> wrote in message news:xYR_9.314$r84.35221@news.uswest.net... > The chapter in "Windows XP Inside Out" suggests using the command "fsutil > file createnew c:\testfile.txt (filesize)" to create a contiguous space for > the MFR table to prevent fragmentation and system slowdown. I tried doing > this but even after defragmentation I could not create large enough of a > file in a single space for the MFR table, perhaps because free space on my > OS partiton is limited. > > I do have Partition Magic but it appears to use the XP conversion utility. > Their documentation does not mention what they do with the MFR. > > Microsoft's documentation warns that some programs may slow down after > conversion "if not written for XP". They say this is avoided if the > partition is formatted for NTFS before XP installation rather than > conversion. They do not say whether this is due to MFT fragmentation or due > to small cluster size after conversion. I think the later problem can be > avoided with Partition Magic? > > Google searches bring up a number of threads about system slowdowns after > conversion to NTFS. > > So, I thought maybe I should leave well enough alone until I get a new > computer. I am not an expert and am at the limit of my knowledge here. > > Is MFT fragmentation really a big problem? > > Thanks again, > > Wayne > > "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu> wrote in message > news:##4iESfyCHA.2680@TK2MSFTNGP09... > > BTW, I have never heard of anyone that has had a problem > when converting from FAT to NTFS, although one is always > warned to have a backup ready in case a recovery is needed > (in your case, one with System State). > > What have you read that makes you nervous ? > > -- > Roger > > "Wayne Phillips" <chaotos@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:TcJ_9.98$63.111631@news.uswest.net... > > I have upgraded from W2K to XP on my laptop. The Boot Partion is fat32. I > > have a second NTFS partition. How secure are encrypted files on the NTFS > > partition should the laptop be stolen? > > > > I am nervous about converting the OS partiton to NTFS without reformating > > first and reinstalling XP, from what have read. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > >
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: ISS maxconnections"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Maybe reply: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Encrypted files on NTFS partition secure if XP OS Partition is fat32?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|