Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)
From: Roger Abell (abell@asu.edu)
Date: 12/23/02
- Next message: Luiz C Laba: "XP -HomeEdition-second phisical drive not secure in NTFS"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- In reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- Next in thread: Sam: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Abell" <abell@asu.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 02:49:27 -0700
PS
I should have added, as this may much help you
understand, our ability to grant the "permission to
manage permissions" very much changes/lessens the
importance of a user being an owner as compared
to the Unix permission model.
-- Roger
- Next message: Luiz C Laba: "XP -HomeEdition-second phisical drive not secure in NTFS"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- In reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- Next in thread: Sam: "Re: Understanding XP file permissions ? (Application Programs not following standards ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|