Re: Standalone Security
From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu)
Date: 12/20/02
- Next message: Drew: "The Security log on this system is full."
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Group Policy Management Console"
- In reply to: Robin Lent: "Standalone Security"
- Next in thread: Doug Knox MS-MVP: "Re: Standalone Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNOSPAM@asu.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:30:13 -0700
In a standalone local policy can only be used to
control all accounts. If you study deeply you will
find that the Guest account when logged in locally
has membership in the Users group, so there is no
real advantage in using the Guest account for this.
-- Roger Abell MS MVP (Security, Windows), MCDBA, MCSE both Associate Expert - Windows XP ExpertZone http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Robin Lent" <fao.adminandcentralservices.wcc@dial.pipex.com> wrote in message news:#JJktW4pCHA.1980@TK2MSFTNGP12... > I have a WindowsXP PC that we would like to use as an intranet, internal, > only access point. I have not got this joined to the domain as we do not > want to have logon ID's required to use the PC. > > Is there a way of locking XP down so that the Guest account can only run > Internet Explorer?? I.e. I need to be able to remove the run command, > access to the control panel etc for the Guest account. Can this be done? > > Thanks, > > Robin. > >
- Next message: Drew: "The Security log on this system is full."
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Group Policy Management Console"
- In reply to: Robin Lent: "Standalone Security"
- Next in thread: Doug Knox MS-MVP: "Re: Standalone Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
