Re: windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally
From: Rich Benack [MS] (richbe@online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/30/02
- Next message: crj: "Administrator Permission needed???"
- Previous message: Aaron: "Screen Saver Password"
- In reply to: Tim Brown: "windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Next in thread: Tim Brown: "Re: windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Reply: Tim Brown: "Re: windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Rich Benack [MS]" <richbe@online.microsoft.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:47:14 -0700
Unfortunately most patch management solutions (SMS, MSUS) use a central
server to distribute paches.
Rich
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Tim Brown" <tbrown@mjsoffe.com> wrote in message
news:uhc0enKaCHA.392@tkmsftngp09...
> Many companies are still using windows 98, including ours. I was just
> wondering what everyone was doing to automate updates so that security
> patches are kept up to date. Do we really have to rely on our end users
to
> update their computers or is there another way of pushing updates out to
> them? Is there any way in a peer to peer or must we go into domains?
>
>
- Next message: crj: "Administrator Permission needed???"
- Previous message: Aaron: "Screen Saver Password"
- In reply to: Tim Brown: "windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Next in thread: Tim Brown: "Re: windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Reply: Tim Brown: "Re: windows 98 administering automatic updates centrally"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
