Re: hotifxes - installing unattended
From: Patrick J. LoPresti (patl@users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 09/21/02
- Next message: martin: "Re: Encryption > access denied after importing key with Certificate"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: help center erasing hard drive?"
- In reply to: Philip Kime: "hotifxes - installing unattended"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: patl@users.sourceforge.net (Patrick J. LoPresti) Date: 21 Sep 2002 12:06:30 -0400
"Philip Kime" <Philip@kime.org.uk> writes:
> I'm getting really fed up with having to deal with
> different hotfixes and varying command-line options. I'm
> trying to get together a system for rolling out hotfixes
> via WMI using Win32_Process and it works for some
> hotfixes but not others. Take the latest MS VM hotfix out
> yesterday (Q329077). It seems to be using older hotfix
> command-line options - none of the new update.exe options
> that XP hotfixes are supposed to take. It only
> takes /Q /T /C and *always* asks whether you want to
> reboot. I want to do a silent install and then reboot,
> without asking. Anybody know if there is a flag for this
> with this older type of installer?
See
<http://unattended.sourceforge.net/installers.html#hotfixes>
The /r:n switch seems to do the trick for Q329077.
- Pat
- Next message: martin: "Re: Encryption > access denied after importing key with Certificate"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: help center erasing hard drive?"
- In reply to: Philip Kime: "hotifxes - installing unattended"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
