Re: Firewall etc
- From: "John Barnett MVP" <freelance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:31:50 +0100
Personally I only use the Windows Firewall and have found it more than adequate. McAfee and Norton I would not use they are system hoggers and, especially Norton, cause more problems than they solve.
--
--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"jo5030" <jo5030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:FD2CC28F-2836-48DD-9D2C-7D48BB8E1A99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Can anyone comment on the effectiveness of the MS supplied Firewall and
Defender offering when compared to other commercial products (such as McAfee
and Norton)? I use Norton at the moment, and it seems to me that if one is
offered through Vista for nothing, I may as well use it rather than pay for
another?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firewall etc
- From: Mark H
- Re: Firewall etc
- Prev by Date: Windows Defender
- Next by Date: Re: Firewall etc
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewall etc
- Next by thread: Re: Firewall etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
