Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: "Paul Smith" <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:44:44 +0100
"Nonny" <nonnymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:s8nm74dvuhml0qtmbc4ou7a2uehahc2lbe@xxxxxxxxxx
It's not broken, doofus, it's out-dated.
I take it the software was written after say 1999/2000. In that case it is broken, and not outdated, there's no excuse for applications written after 2000 to assume they have administrative rights.
--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/
http://www.windowsresource.net/
*Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Michael D. Ober
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- References:
- Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Jim Selinsky
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Steve Thackery
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Nonny
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Root Kit
- Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- From: Nonny
- Possible UAC Improvement
- Prev by Date: Re: Issue w/ Password for Administrator Account
- Next by Date: UAC not allowing a startup program
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- Next by thread: Re: Possible UAC Improvement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|