Re: icacls or subinacl
- From: "Al Dunbar" <AlanDrub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:32:54 -0600
"Todd Hudson" <tatung70@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:69D2720B-577D-447A-BDB5-F3408E097C31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am trying to figure out a way to backup the entire drive (D, E, etc) of a
Windows 2003 server. I tried looking at the syntax for subinacl and
icacls,
but either I could not figure it out or it just did not work.
Can anyone help?
I assume you are thinking of using subinacl and icacls to extract
ownership/ntfs permission information in order to store it with the data so
that your restore script, program, or whatever, can re-apply the original
permissions that restored files previously had. That's fine, but I do no
think either utility will actually create a copy of the files themselves.
I'm not sure what to suggest here, as I do not know if you are doing a tape
backup, an image copy to a removable drive, or across the LAN to a storage
device.
/Al
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: icacls or subinacl
- From: Todd Hudson
- Re: icacls or subinacl
- References:
- icacls or subinacl
- From: Todd Hudson
- icacls or subinacl
- Prev by Date: Certificate Authority service fails to start due to corrupt log fi
- Next by Date: Re: icacls or subinacl
- Previous by thread: icacls or subinacl
- Next by thread: Re: icacls or subinacl
- Index(es):