Re: NTFS woes
- From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:34:04 -0700
Deny does not always overrule a grant.
An explicit deny overrules and explicit or inherited grant.
However, an inherited deny does not overrule an explicit
grant and it may or may not overrule an inherited grant (it
depends on the full context of inheritance).
That said, are you setting the full control on the folder and
the deny on the file? If so, what you may have going on
here is the "hidden delete" grant that is part of a grant of
Full on a folder. This "hidden delete" is part of requirements
for Posix compliance and is something of a pain. It imparts
ability to delete anything in the folder even though there is
no permissions on those things to delete them.
Consider granting on the folder Modify plus permission to
change permissions (which then would be Full minus the
permission to take ownership and minus the "hidden delete")
Roger
"Rik G." <q@xxxx> wrote in message
news:479694f1$0$31874$bf4948fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've given a user full control over a folder, its sub folders and files.
I want to prevent the user from deleting one particular file in that
folder. He should only be able to read it.
When I create an explicit Deny Delete permission for that file, the user
can
still delete the file. I thought that Deny permissions always took
precedence over Allow permissions?
What's going on? Can this be done with NTFS at all?
Regards
R.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NTFS woes
- From: Rik G.
- Re: NTFS woes
- From: Rik G.
- Re: NTFS woes
- References:
- NTFS woes
- From: Rik G.
- NTFS woes
- Prev by Date: NTFS woes
- Next by Date: Re: NTFS woes
- Previous by thread: NTFS woes
- Next by thread: Re: NTFS woes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|