Re: PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- From: "Brian Komar" <brian.komar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:27:30 -0600
Sorry, not a lot of time to respond this evening (writing the 2nd edition of my PKI book :-S)
"BZP" <p.audonnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:3d50de26-c005-4db1-aae6-c7f53791c759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks !It may send responses to each CA, but only stops when it receives a certificate from a CA. Not really a roll back, but similar
As regards the isolation process (Americas users use only Americas
CA), ok for the first way, via persmissions. But I'm wondering
something, it prevents users from getting certificates from a
delocalized CA but it doesn't prevent users contacting the bad CA
(does it?). For exemple, when a user need a certificate for encrypting
his files. An automatic process will ask to a CA for a EFS
certificates. And if the process use the bad CA, it rolls back to an
other CA ? (Am I clear ?) or the process will use only CA where
permissions are ok (how can it check this without contacting the CA ?
permission are published in AD ? configuration context ?)
That's a great link (microsoft.com/pki) ! Thanks for this.
No problem
This is another way, but could lead to a lot of configuration headaches. I would not recommend it, even though I wrote the whitepaper.
And what about X500 name constraints ? This function can be achieved
by constraint extensions ? For exemple I configure a CA with
constraint : issuing certificated only if subject CN match with
"*,DC=AMERICAS,DC=LOCAL". Will this serve ?
For the point 3, you want to say that CA certificates are published in
AD ? Is there a AD store like there is a User store in a computer ?
How does it work ?
Not quite. The certificates are published to the Configuration naming context. The autoenrollment process ensures that these are plumbed to the AD clients running win2k or higher
I can't get what the purpose of the Issuance Policies (Low, Medium,
High). What is the interest ?
See RFC 3647 and look for assurance levels. this is a rudimentary implementation and most companies do custom assurance levels.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
P.J.A.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- From: BZP
- Re: PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- From: Brian Komar
- Re: PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- From: BZP
- PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- Prev by Date: Re: Network drives show disconnected, sometimes, but still work?
- Next by Date: Create certificate with makecert for LDAPS on a DC ?
- Previous by thread: Re: PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- Next by thread: Re: PKI in multi sites/domains environment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|