Moving ACLs to new server

I have a bunch of data that I need to move from one file server to another.
I want to retain the ACLs but the problem is that we're using local security
groups and when I copy the ACL's along with the files/folders the SIDS are
refering to the old server name. I have thousands of folders and I obviously
can't change them all individually. What is the easiest way to retain the
ACLs during the move but inherit the new server name in the SIDS? BTW, I'm
using Robocopy to copy the data. Thanks!


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Win2K Migration
    ... So that old ACLs point to the NEW ... >> I'm confused as to what needs to be replicated when migrating from ... >> Is this due to the SIDs not having been migrated? ... > Not from server to server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: Moving ACLs to new server
    ... to move data and retain ACLs --> robocoby ... I want to retain the ACLs but the problem is that we're using local ... SIDS are refering to the old server name. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)
  • Re: ASP_WP - driving me mad!!!
    ... It *is* easy -- your customer seems to have futzed with ACLs on their web ... server to make your life difficult. ... I have ensured that my permissions are set correctly. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)
  • Re: ADMT TcpipClientSupport registry key NT 4.0 to AD
    ... I would take a network trace of the failure and see where it fails. ... > but I keep getting this error message "Either the source> domain's primary domain controller (PDC) has not been re-> started after setting the tcpipClientSupport registry key> to 1 or the PDC could not be contacted." ... > I have discarded the communication problem between the NT> 4.0 server and the Windows 2003 server because when I do> not select "Migrate user SIDs to target domain" the> migration is successful. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Enabling telnet, ftp, pop3 for root...
    ... Many users do not have a functional knowledge of ACLs, of those that do, they find them very confusing, because the repercussions of them leaves something else entirely open for analysis. ... If you want to argue Windows 2k/2k3 Server verses Windows NT Server 3.51, you can argue until you're blue in the face about reasons to upgrade to Windows 2000 Server or 2003 Server over NT 3.51, but I know of at least one place that is still running NT 3.51 as a server. ... This is a bit of an exaggeration, as I don't expect someone wanting help with that system will be on Usenet; however, with UNIX systems, the capability to deal with sudo is more common then the capability to deal with ACLs. ... And there could be performance reasons in the choice of a filesystem, depending on the content of the filesystem. ...
    (alt.os.linux)