Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- From: "Arthur Dent" <hitchhikersguideto-news@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:44 -0500
Yah, thats what i wound up doing... going with the local machine account. I was just curious if there was anyway to effect that kind of domain user; its a network i did not set up, and am coming into semi-admining after the fact, so i dont have control of how things were done.. and was just hoping there would be some way of doing it without having to go modify every network resouce after the fact to remove the Everyone access.
I guess not....
Thanks for the help though! :)
"Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:O5XJ06KVHHA.1212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If as one builds out a Windows AD domain one does not spec the
allowed login usages of machines (local and net) and so one just
lets things default, then you end up pretty much with any domain
account able to access any non-DC either way (it is actually even
more loose than that).
Just because the defaults exist does not mean one should accept
them, since, after all, they are defined to be reasonably restrictive
while yet allowing for the most common scenarios to work.
If each machine as added is controlled as to the allowed local
and network logins based on its use case, then your need would
be simply filled. However, with Everyone and Users still in
the Network and Users still in the local login rights on numerous
machines, defining a domain account does grant broad access.
Under those conditions use of a machine local account can often
be the most simple solution to effect restriction.
Roger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- References:
- Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- Next by Date: Re: Windows XPx64 does not require user authenication against Sharepoi
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- Next by thread: Re: Windows equiv of UNIX "Restricted Users"??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|