Re: Stans-alone root CA or Enterprise root CA
- From: "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:02:08 -0500
Unless you are going to be using a stand alone offline root CA which would
be very unusual for a small domain you really want to an Enterprise CA in a
domain. If not too much of a problem you could uninstall CA services from
the server and reinstall it as Enterprise CA. Enterprise CA can make it much
easier to request and issue computer and possibly user certificates via
Group Policy particularly when the CA is installed on Windows 2003
Enterprise edition which lets you use version 2 templates. You might be able
to do what you want to issue the certificate needed for the WIFI as is but
down the road you may want to take more advantage of PKI in your domain and
then you will appreciate an enterprise CA.
"pestocat" <gel114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OIV2L1UzGHA.3748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a small domain that I want to setup EAP/PEAP for a WIFi wireless
switch environment and need to issue certificate to the switch. I have
already installed a Stand-alone root CA, but after reading Chapter 10 of
"The Ultimate Windows Server 2003 System Administrator's Guide", I get the
impression I should have installed Enterprise root CA. Is this correct.
What are the tradeoffs?
Thank you
.
- References:
- Stans-alone root CA or Enterprise root CA
- From: pestocat
- Stans-alone root CA or Enterprise root CA
- Prev by Date: Stans-alone root CA or Enterprise root CA
- Next by Date: Re: Multiple 538 and 540 ID's in 2003 server Security Events Log?
- Previous by thread: Stans-alone root CA or Enterprise root CA
- Next by thread: Re: Multiple 538 and 540 ID's in 2003 server Security Events Log?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
