Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- From: OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:09:03 -0700
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
The extra shares, to which there is but should not be access, are set to
allow what groups at the share/NTFS levels ?
There is something to which access is granted, such as the machine
local Users group, or Network, or Authenticate Users, which does
include the NonDomainUser group member(s).
"OM" <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OGai5xltGHA.5056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHi,
I have a AD network with 3 2003 DCs. Most of our workstations are attached to the domain while only 40 PCs are non-domain machines.
What I would like to do is to allow all non-domain PCs to be able to access one shared folder in one of the member server within the domain using one particular user account.
I created a group called nondomainuser and put a newly created user account into the group. I removed this user from the domain users group so it only belong to the nondomainuser group. On the shared folder, I setup the Share/NTFS permission so that only the nondomainuser group have read access to it. With this setup, the user is able to access the shared folder without problem. However, this account is also able to access shared folders that are accessible by the members in the domain users group which is something I don't want. The thing that I don't understand is this user account is not a member of the domain users, but he is still able to access shared folders that are for members of the domain users.
I know I might be able to achieve this by removing everyone from the share permission on the share folder. However, this is going to lot of time and I might miss out something as I many shared folder on the server
Can someone advice me if there is any simple solution for such problem?
Thanks
OM
All the shares are set with read/change for everyone and I fine tuned the permission on the NTFS level. Only users are defined in the nondomainuser group.
Thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- References:
- Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- From: OM
- Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- Prev by Date: Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- Next by Date: Re: Security Configuration Wizard: 2nd try
- Previous by thread: Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- Next by thread: Re: Can this be done without affecting current configuration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|