Re: Share permissions conflicting with NTFS permissions
- From: "Karl Levinson" <levinson_k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:47:21 -0400
This is working as expected. When Share permissions and NTFS file
permissions are different, you only get the most restrictive of the two. In
your example, people would only be able to Read at most when accessing those
files through the network. Because NTFS file permissions are so much more
granular than Share permissions, most people usually assign that share Full
Control [or the highest level of permissions required across the network] to
Everyone or better yet to Authenticated Users, and then scale back the
permissions granularly using NTFS file and folder permissions.
"Greg" <Greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4FBB7576-559A-4169-90F8-DB3C6EAEF57D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a Share with the Domain Users group assigned Read access. In the
subfolders I have individual user accounts assigned with Various NTFS File
Permissions= Change, Write, even Full Control. None of these users can do
anything in the subfolders unless I go back to the Share Folder
Permissions,
and grant Change, or Full Control. What am I overlooking here? This is on
Windows 2003
.
- Prev by Date: Problem requesting certificates
- Next by Date: Re: Share permissions conflicting with NTFS permissions
- Previous by thread: Problem requesting certificates
- Next by thread: Re: Share permissions conflicting with NTFS permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|