Re: Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- From: Ken Long <kenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:04:28 GMT
For instance, I have logons disabled from 12 AM to 5 AM. Sometimes an
employee will show up a few minutes before 5 and will logon onto their
PC without logging onto the network so they can check POP3 email and
access the Internet. They can also go directly to read-only network
resources and gain access without logging into our Windows network
first. My thinking was they were able to do this because I had the
permissions on those read-only resources (files) set with the Everyone
group instead of the Authenticated Users group. Am I mistaken?
Ken
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:42:03 -0700, "Roger Abell [MVP]"
<mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
subinacl(Reply address works as is.)
but . . . what do you believe you will accomplish ? as Authenticated
Users is Everyone unless you are allowing Everyone to include
anonymous. (Just trying to make sure . . . )
.
- References:
- Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- From: Ken Long
- Re: Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with Domain Admin becoming Administrator (builtin)
- Next by Date: Re: GPO not picking up computer settings
- Previous by thread: Re: Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- Next by thread: Re: Everyone vs Authenticated Users
- Index(es):