Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session
From: S. Pidgorny
Date: 10/28/05
- Next message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Previous message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "INTERACTIVE group missing after SSPI auth"
- In reply to: Tim Sanderson: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Next in thread: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Reply: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:30:11 +1000
Tim,
I think transparent single sign-on may be a requirement, and that is
problematic with OpenSSH. I find SSH (both freeware and commercial versions)
support for Kerberos lacking and badly documented. Vintela provides and
alternative but their server product is a requirement. I agree with Steven's
suggestion to look into IPsec - and existing NTLM support will facilitate
SSO.
-- Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- "Tim Sanderson" <trsandersonii@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OcVtgMw2FHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Save yourself the trouble and install OpenSSH for Windows, a telnet/FTP > alternative.
- Next message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Previous message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "INTERACTIVE group missing after SSPI auth"
- In reply to: Tim Sanderson: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Next in thread: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Reply: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: Kerberos V5 Authentication for a Telnet Session"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|