re: Hardware Firewall VS ISA Server
rick.kingslan_at_microsoft.com
Date: 10/27/05
- Previous message: rick.kingslan_at_microsoft.com: "Re: Access Deined event logs"
- Maybe in reply to: Jacob Arthur: "Hardware Firewall VS ISA Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:18:10 -0700('UTF-8' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Is your Exchange model going to be a FE/BE (Front end/back end model) or are you intending to just publish an OWA server through a firewall?
If you are planning on a DMZ (I suggest it regardless of who's solution you choose...) do you intend to use a simple single-layer DMZ with a three-prong firewall (screened subnet) or a three layer DMZ with two firewalls creating a truly segmented public/private/internal trust structure?
--- Rick [msft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Arthur Posted At: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:13 AM Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.server.security Conversation: Hardware Firewall VS ISA Server Subject: Hardware Firewall VS ISA Server I am looking at putting several servers in a rack in a datacenter. I obviously want some sort of firewall solution, and I am wondering what opinions some of you might have about the topic. I will need to serve out Exchange services through the firewall, so I would either have to publish the Exchange server in ISA or open up access to it in some sort of DMZ with a hardware firewall. What experiences/suggestions do you have about one versus the other? Thanks, Jacob
- Previous message: rick.kingslan_at_microsoft.com: "Re: Access Deined event logs"
- Maybe in reply to: Jacob Arthur: "Hardware Firewall VS ISA Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|