Security Configuration Editor versus Wizard for 2003 policy
From: Marco Shaw (marco_at_Znbnet.nb.ca)
Date: 09/26/05
- Next message: Brian Komar [MVP]: "Re: revoking ipsec certificate doesn't work"
- Previous message: Nospam: "Re: 2003 server with PCanywhere i"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Security Configuration Editor versus Wizard for 2003 policy"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Security Configuration Editor versus Wizard for 2003 policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:59:23 -0300
Writing up a new security policy for 2003 servers. 2003SP1 comes with SCW,
but there's the SCE (since 2000SP4) out there too. I realize they both do
some different things.
SCE is a bit less user-friendly than SCW which comes with a nice wizard.
These days, what are the risks of having run only SCW on a Windows 2003 web
server? Should I still run one of the 'high security' .inf templates from
SCE on these systems for a 'best effort' against break-ins?
I can't remember the last time we've had a Windows break in, since a trojan
management to get onto a unsecured NT4 box a few years ago.
Marco
- Next message: Brian Komar [MVP]: "Re: revoking ipsec certificate doesn't work"
- Previous message: Nospam: "Re: 2003 server with PCanywhere i"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Security Configuration Editor versus Wizard for 2003 policy"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Security Configuration Editor versus Wizard for 2003 policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|