Re: Grant Object Access
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 08/22/05
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Previous message: Adam Clark: "Re: Errors!"
- In reply to: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Next in thread: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Reply: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:54:13 -0700
I am really missing something, as an upload component would be a more
effective way to do the upload would it not? An on-access scanner would
then be covering the potentially infected part of it automatically.
--
Roger Abell
Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
"Andrew Hayes" <AndrewHayes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23KnD5AvpFHA.1996@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Yes. This is going to be used for anonymous web access, but since the user
> has no control over the scheduled tasks in themselves (all the user can do
> is upload a data file), I don't think there is much risk. When the upload
is
> complete, the server automatically writes information about the datafile
to
> a database, enumerates the tasks to see if the virus-scan is already
> running, and if not then it creates a new task for starting a scan against
> the file the user uploaded.
>
> As it happens, there was a mistake in the ASP code in that it wasn't
setting
> one of our COM+ objects properties correctly, which was causing the follow
> on exception, but I hadn't been able to see that until I had got it pass
the
> Enumerating Scheduled Tasks error.
>
> As of this moment it all works correctly, so long as the IUSR_ account is
> part of the administrators group. Of course, that will not do in a
> production environment.
>
> I'll go through the KB article you posted Roger and see if I can get it to
> work that way. Last ditch attempt would be to use NTRights and add each
> right until it succeeds in creating the task, then remove them all and try
> again until I can get the minimum needed for it to work.
>
> The other way would be for the ASP page to create the COM+ object under a
> different identify, but I'm not sure how that works... More research is
> needed.
>
> Regards...Andrew
>
> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> news:u1AwGitpFHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > The accesses you were being denied were to start and to query the
> > service. I am not so sure that granting those will allow you to then
> > schedule a new task, which your subsequent posts make it sound like
> > you are trying to do. The way I adjust rights to services is to define
> > a security config editor template that is new, hence totally enpty,
> > and then use the services node to edit the values for the concerned
> > service, after which one uses the templated to analyze and configure
> > the machine.
> > That said, I have to wonder what in the world you are wanting to
> > do this for . . . As it now appears, you are wanting to allow the
> > Iusr_ account to define new scheduled tasks, and/or to manage
> > scheduled tasks. But the Iusr_ account is not used for authenticated
> > web access, so this means you are wanting to allow anonymous web
> > browsers to tweak around in the machine's scheduled tasks ??? !!! #
> > A recipe for disaster that sounds to be.
> >
> > --
> > Roger Abell
> > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> > "Andrew Hayes" <AndrewHayes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:OFCkn9spFHA.3084@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> False alarm. Sorry folks. :-(
> >>
> >> The reason I got past the previous error when trying to get service
> >> status
> >> was that I had added IUSR_ to the local administrators group. Adding
the
> >> Legacy Component does not correct the problem if I remove IUSR_ from
the
> >> local admin group.
> >>
> >> So the question is, what rights do I give IUSR_ to allow it to use the
> >> Schedule service correctly without making it a local administrator?
> >>
> >> I'll be taking a look at NTRights that Roger mentioned.
> >>
> >> Regards...Andrew
> >>
> >> "Andrew Hayes" <AndrewHayes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:uvhwklspFHA.764@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> > From what you have said, Roger, and from what the various KB articles
> >> > concerning that error has lead me to, is that the IUSER_ account
> >> > doesn't
> >> > have the privileges. Right enough.
> >> >
> >> > Now, how to set those privileges?
> >> >
> >> > I finally found one way to do it.
> >> >
> >> > Using DCOMCNFG, I opened the COM+ library application that contains
all
> >> > the COM+ components for the web application, and tried adding a
> >> > "Component", selecting the Install New Component option and browsing
to
> >> > the MSTASK.DLL file. This gives me the error "One or more files do
not
> >> > contain component or type libraries. These files cannot be
installed."
> >> >
> >> > So much for Scheduler being a COM component, but then, I use COM to
> >> > work
> >> > with it from the VC++ code. Very strange. So I tied to add a new
> >> > "Legacy
> >> > Component"...
> >> >
> >> > Although the Scheduler doesn't show up with a human-friendly name, as
> >> > it
> >> > has no ProgID, it's CLSID was listed so I added it using that. Seemed
> >> > to
> >> > work, although it creates an icon with no name. I then changed the
> >> > identify of the created object to one that has local administrator
> > rights,
> >> > and gave local Launch, Activation and Access permissions to the local
> >> > IUSER_ and NETWORK_SERVICE accounts.
> >> >
> >> > Ran through my process again, and I no longer get the 560 for the
> > Schedule
> >> > object acccess but it is generating an Exception that I need to track
> >> > down.
> >> >
> >> > Still, I'm a little further along than I had been, and I hope what I
> >> > discovered would be useful to someone.
> >> >
> >> > Regards...Andrew
> >> >
> >> > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > news:utWtGYWpFHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> >>I am not aware what your COM+ component is attempting to do,
> >> >> but from the event message you post it would appear to me that
> >> >> a chain of events leading to attempt to get a handle to the Schedule
> >> >> service that allows querying and starting that service is denied.
> >> >> One does not grant rights to services in the ways you have attempted
> >> >> by altering the NTFS permissions on the binaries. Rather you need
> >> >> to either use security templates of such as NTrights.exe from the
> >> >> resource kit.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Roger Abell
> >> >> Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> >> MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> >> "Andrew Hayes" <AndrewHayes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> >> >> message
> >> >> news:%23Xp7hLJpFHA.708@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> As part of my continuing efforts to get COM+ components running
under
> >> >>> Windows 2003 Server SP1, I enabled Object Access auditing and File
> >> >> auditing,
> >> >>> and ran through the process that is failing.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> One failure event was logged in the security log:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Event Type: Failure Audit
> >> >>> Event Source: Security
> >> >>> Event Category: Object Access
> >> >>> Event ID: 560
> >> >>> Date: 2005/08/19
> >> >>> Time: 16:10:44
> >> >>> User: WIN2003\IUSR_WIN2003
> >> >>> Computer: WIN2003
> >> >>> Description:
> >> >>> Object Open:
> >> >>> Object Server: SC Manager
> >> >>> Object Type: SERVICE OBJECT
> >> >>> Object Name: Schedule
> >> >>> Handle ID: -
> >> >>> Operation ID: {0,84340653}
> >> >>> Process ID: 476
> >> >>> Image File Name: C:\WINDOWS\system32\services.exe
> >> >>> Primary User Name: WIN2003$
> >> >>> Primary Domain: DOMAIN
> >> >>> Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
> >> >>> Client User Name: IUSR_WIN2003
> >> >>> Client Domain: WIN2003
> >> >>> Client Logon ID: (0x0,0x504A958)
> >> >>> Accesses: Query status of service
> >> >>> Start the service
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Privileges: -
> >> >>> Restricted Sid Count: 0
> >> >>> Access Mask: 0x14
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For more information, see Help and Support Center at
> >> >>> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This most certainly is the culprit of the Access Denied error I'm
> >> >>> getting
> >> >> in
> >> >>> my component.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Now... Can anyone help me with granting access to Schedule? I've
> >> >>> tried
> >> >>> giving IUSR_WIN2003 "read and execute" and "read" permissions to
> >> >>> services.exe and mstask.dll, but to no avail.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;833001&sd=ee
> >> >>> mentions something similiar with OWA and clusters, but uses Active
> >> >> Directory
> >> >>> Users and Computers to change the settings, which doesn't exist on
> > this
> >> >>> server as it's not part of Active Directory.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards...Andrew
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Previous message: Adam Clark: "Re: Errors!"
- In reply to: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Next in thread: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Reply: Andrew Hayes: "Re: Grant Object Access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
