Re: Advice request: Backdoor hack on Windows Small Business Server

From: Michael Friedman (MichaelFriedman_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/31/05


Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:30:01 -0700

Karl,

Wow, thanks for the great information! I appreciate your detail and
suggestions.

To follow up, I was able to determine the program binding: NeDDS.exe. This
was listed in the services as a legacy Network service. Once disabled, all
traffic back and forth on the server stopped. I believe there is still a
vulnerability on the server that was activating the executable but since it's
not there, it can't. I am still on the lookout (I was away most of the
weekend). Fortunately, this server is not one of high risk and is more of a
test server so, while very interested, I am not fretting too much. This has
been a great exercise.

Thank you all for responding so well. I hope I can return the favor sometime.

Michael

"Karl Levinson, mvp" wrote:

> There is a lot of information on these sorts of very common hacks, if you
> search for "ftp tagging" or "pubstro."
>
> Although your firewall seems to be blocking people from downloading files,
> it sounds like 1) your server could still be vulnerable with an open hole,
> 2) attackers may still be remotely managing your server and 3) it is
> probably still running hidden FTP software somewhere, perhaps hidden by a
> root kit or perhaps that you just haven't found yet. [The fact that the FTP
> data files were visible to you makes me think that perhaps no root kit is in
> use.]
>
> The vulnerabilities you fixed are not the ones I would think let this to
> occur, although hopefully MBSA has made sure you now have all the Microsoft
> security patches installed. If an easily guessable password, insecure
> configuration setting or an unpatched program that MBSA does not check for
> was used, then there could still be a problem. If there were other missing
> patches that you installed and didn't list here, then it could be that you
> did find and fix the problem.
>
> You say that your FTP service is locked down, but do be sure that the
> anonymous user [such as IUSR] cannot both write and read to any one FTP
> folder. There should be a read-only download folder and/or a write-only
> upload folder.
>
> If you still haven't found the hidden FTP service [if there is one],
> downloading Hijack This and posting the logs to the Hijack This web forum
> may be helpful. Filemon from www.sysinternals.com may be helpful as well.
>
> For detecting intrusions, I highly recommend running a file change checker
> such as the free Languard SIM from www.gfi.com [you have to really search
> for it, but it's there, I swear] or Osiris on your servers. You have to run
> it a few times and tell it to ignore any files that change frequently that
> you are sure are supposed to be changing. Typically, these programs will
> run once a day and send you an email or create a log of any changed files.
> If you are hacked and a file changes, you might only be given one
> notification of the file change, so checking the log for every day is
> advisable. These tools do not necessarily detect root kit hidden files, but
> they may detect other files that a root kit forgot to hide.
>
> These links should give some info on looking for intrusions and on further
> hardening your system. MBSA is a great tool, but it alone is not a thorough
> check for server security:
>
> http://securityadmin.info/faq.asp#ftpfolder
> http://securityadmin.info/faq.asp#hacked
> http://securityadmin.info/faq.asp#harden
>
>
> "Michael Friedman" <MichaelFriedman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:87917263-A1B1-436D-AC8C-A591B925328C@microsoft.com...
>
> > However, I noticed the "System Volume Information" was back, along with a
> > new 900MB of stuff. Clearly some app is still on my system that goes
> remote
> > and synchronizes somewhere. Norton Antivirus Corporate 8.0 does not see
> any
> > viruses. Adaware eliminated only 2 spam cookies.
> >
> > I went to Microsoft's security site and downloaded the security analyzer
> > (which is great) and it exposed risks in my SQL Home Edition, SBS,
> Exchange,
> > and MSXML. I patched all of these late (very late) last night.
> >
> > So, I believe I have a handle on the security and where the issue is
> > located, but am unable to determine what is causing the addition of the
> > "system volume info" folder and it's french junk. I'd like to be rid of
> it.
> >
> > Anyone experiencing these issues or similar, advice is appreciated. Of
> > course, I will continue to search through the Trojan horse & backdoor hack
> > reports.
>
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Advice request: Backdoor hack on Windows Small Business Server
    ... Microsoft MVP (Windows Security) ... > traffic back and forth on the server stopped. ... >> probably still running hidden FTP software somewhere, ... >> notification of the file change, so checking the log for every day is ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)
  • Re: Advice request: Backdoor hack on Windows Small Business Server 200
    ... search for "ftp tagging" or "pubstro." ... root kit or perhaps that you just haven't found yet. ... security patches installed. ... I highly recommend running a file change checker ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)
  • security-basics Digest of: get.123_145
    ... VPN to ASP a security risk? ... Re: Multiple IPSec tunnels? ... Subject: Security NT Server ... VPN to ASP a security risk? ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • << SBS News of the week - Sept 26 >>
    ... And he points to the info you need to put the file on the server in the ... at the network perimeter. ... The Symantec Firewall/VPN and the Gateway Security ... by the firewall at risk. ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
  • Re: << SBS News of the week - Sept 26 >>
    ... > And he points to the info you need to put the file on the server in the ... > at the network perimeter. ... The Symantec Firewall/VPN and the Gateway Security ... An attacker can exploit these flaws in tandem via specially ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)