Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?
From: Paul Adare (padare_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: taco: "Re: Users cannot change password"
- Previous message: Justin Merth: "Remote access to a COM"
- In reply to: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:18:39 -0500
In article <112ed8qgpqbqi8d@corp.supernews.com>, in the
microsoft.public.windows.server.security news group, Dave
<dsturgeon@dont.send.any.spam.here.gmail.com> says...
> I was under the impression that even if you do build a stand alone root ca
> that you still have to connect it periocially to update the CRLs?
>
You need to turn it on periodically to issue an updated CRL, however,
you do not need to attach it to a network to do so. Copy the updated CRL
to a floppy or a USB device and then take that to a member computer and
publish it from there.
-- Paul Adare "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
- Next message: taco: "Re: Users cannot change password"
- Previous message: Justin Merth: "Remote access to a COM"
- In reply to: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]