Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?
From: Paul Adare (padare_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: User configuration question"
- Previous message: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- In reply to: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:34:32 -0500
In article <112e7ppda55e7a2@corp.supernews.com>, in the
microsoft.public.windows.server.security news group, Dave
<dsturgeon@dont.send.any.spam.here.gmail.com> says...
> Thanks for the good information Steve. One more question-
>
> It appears that it is recommended that the stand alone root be installed on
> a machine that is not a member of the domain. I am guessing this is due to
> the secure channel passwords that are only good for 30 days and would
> therefor cause problems if the machine were off the network for longer
> periods than that. I would prefer to install it on a domain member that I
> just take off the network and put back once every couple weeks to sync up.
> What are your thoughts on this?
>
Why?
The whole point of a standalone offline root is that you never, ever
attach it to a network, which dramatically increases the security of the
private key.
Why do you feel the need to install a standalone root on a member
server? What is the perceived benefit here?
-- Paul Adare "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: User configuration question"
- Previous message: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- In reply to: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Issuing Enterprise Subordinate CA - Why not a DC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|