Re: Qustion about blcoking ips with ipsecpol
From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Previous message: Louis Schreyer: "Qustion about blcoking ips with ipsecpol"
- In reply to: Louis Schreyer: "Qustion about blcoking ips with ipsecpol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:05:15 -0600
"Louis Schreyer" <info@aquarix.de> wrote in message
news:cvpjuj$thl$1@online.de...
> Hello again,
>
> can someone tell me which priority blocking filters have in respect to
rules
> in ipsecpol which open specific ports?
The same. It depends on the SPECIFICITY mostly.
> My problem is:
> I have one rule "Block all traffic" which block anything
> Then there are some rules opening ports for http, smtp and pop3.
Yes.
> Then I want to block several IP ranges, but this does not seem to work,
> because the opener-rules seem to have priority.
If you put in a SPECIFIC IP and a specific port block
it should take precendence I believe.
(If you opened 80, then close 80 for that address.)
> How can I open a port to all except a specific ip range in ipsecpol?
-- Herb Martin > > Louis > >
- Previous message: Louis Schreyer: "Qustion about blcoking ips with ipsecpol"
- In reply to: Louis Schreyer: "Qustion about blcoking ips with ipsecpol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]