What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?
From: Louis schreyer (spam1_at_aquarix.de)
Date: 02/25/05
- Previous message: Robert: "Re: Anonymous Acccess to File Share on Windows Server 2003"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:22:22 +0100
I would like to access my W2K webserver via a vpn with pptp connection
(chap2, password with >24 characters).
I now use the built-in ftp server from w2k server.
What is more secure? Leave the ftp ports open to the public or the vpn port?
The vpn connection would be nicer for me to work with, but I am not sure if
it is safe enough. I cannot opn a l2tp connection, my router will not let me
connect to the server with L2TP, so only PPTP is left.
Any suggestions?
Louis
- Previous message: Robert: "Re: Anonymous Acccess to File Share on Windows Server 2003"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: What is more worse: Open ftp ports or open vpn port with pptp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|