Re: SMTP Security
From: NoSpam (me_at_here.com)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: Mark Gamache: "Re: 2003 PKI Design Question"
- Previous message: Eric O'Callaghan: "2003 PKI Design Question"
- In reply to: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Next in thread: NoSpam: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Reply: NoSpam: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:05:16 +1100
Thanks again. Neither IP address nor localhost allow connection.
"Hairy One Kenobi" <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
news:AfhTd.55$4O3.16@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> "NoSpam" <me@here.com> wrote in message
> news:jr7Td.9006$i6.100851@nasal.pacific.net.au...
> > Thanks Hairy One,
> >
> > Nice try, but I use this tool all of the time and the ini files, etc
came
> > along too and got tweeked as required.
> >
> > This would also not explain why I can not telnet to my own port 25 but I
> can
> > telnet to my own port 80.
>
> <Slaps head> must have been a long day when I replied...
>
> Have you checked that you haven't picked-up a catch-all policy that is
> intended to prevent a zombied machine from sending spam?
>
> Also, when telnetting, are you connecting to localhost, or the specific IP
> address?
>
> H1K
>
>
- Next message: Mark Gamache: "Re: 2003 PKI Design Question"
- Previous message: Eric O'Callaghan: "2003 PKI Design Question"
- In reply to: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Next in thread: NoSpam: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Reply: NoSpam: "Re: SMTP Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|