Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise
From: Griff (Griff_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: RRAS Monitor"
- Previous message: Paul Wicks: "Re: RRAS Monitor"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:19:01 -0800
Can I make the Version 1 Certs work in a 2003 VPN and Exchange environment
"Steven L Umbach" wrote:
> An Enterprise CA makes more sense for an AD domain. Windows 2003 Standard
> however does not have the more advanced feature of Windows 2003 Enterprise,
> namely version 2 templates which can be used for autoenrollment for users
> and computers. You can however enable automatic request for computer
> certificates via Group Policy. --- Steve
>
>
> "Griff" <Griff@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:ADD7F834-9C85-46E9-9B03-AE81656A9D3E@microsoft.com...
> > My company wants to secure VPN traffic and executive emails using
> > certificates. With the limitations of 2003 standard, can I do this? If so
> > should I install the CA as an Enterprise or stand alone? Thanks
>
>
>
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: RRAS Monitor"
- Previous message: Paul Wicks: "Re: RRAS Monitor"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|