Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise
From: Mark Gamache (mark.gamache_at_css-security.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Josh: "Re: The local policy of this system does not allow you to log on interactively"
- Previous message: Josh: "Re: The local policy of this system does not allow you to log on interactively"
- In reply to: Griff: "2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:54:33 -0800
In general, you want the Enterprise CA. It directly interfaces with AD
which makes management much easier. There might be specific design
considerations in your environment that may change that, but it is unlikely.
-- Mark Gamache Certified Security Solutions http://www.css-security.com "Griff" <Griff@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:ADD7F834-9C85-46E9-9B03-AE81656A9D3E@microsoft.com... > My company wants to secure VPN traffic and executive emails using > certificates. With the limitations of 2003 standard, can I do this? If so > should I install the CA as an Enterprise or stand alone? Thanks
- Next message: Josh: "Re: The local policy of this system does not allow you to log on interactively"
- Previous message: Josh: "Re: The local policy of this system does not allow you to log on interactively"
- In reply to: Griff: "2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 2003 Standard CA Stand Alone Vs. Enterprise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|