Re: Prevent logon without certificate
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Mark Gamache: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Previous message: Art Vandelay: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- In reply to: Mark Gamache: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Next in thread: Art Vandeley: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:42:43 -0600
That [ipsec transport] would be good advice within the lan but for remote
access using a VPN server with a L2TP connection and then accessing Remote
Desktop through the tunnel would work well. --- Steve
"Mark Gamache" <mark.gamache@css-security.com> wrote in message
news:%23Igbyt%23AFHA.3596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Ahhhh... That makes more sense. What you want to do is create an IPSec
> policy specifically for TS. The article below does just that.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q315055&sd=tech
>
> Mark Gamache
> CSS
>
> "Art Vandelay" <idozaf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:35qdanF4q1j2qU1@individual.net...
>>
>>> My main question is, why would certificate be a requirement (I can see
>>> some
>>> advantages, but I would like to see if Art has a good reason for this or
>>> is there a better solution -- e.g. Smart Card for users)? Who can add
>>> computers to domain? By default "Authenticated Users can add 10
>>> computers to domain, but if you change the policy only domain
>>> administrators (or another group of users) will be able to add computers
>>> to domain...
>>
>> Hi, thanks for your reply. Maybe knowing what we want to achieve is the
>> way forward as it looks like certificates are not what I thought :-)
>>
>> We can get access to our server at the office from remote sites if we
>> enable "remote desktop" and forward port 3389 through our firewall. We
>> haven't actually done that yet, as we are, of course, worried about the
>> security implications. We thought that if we enabled certificate services
>> on our network and allowed only computers that had a certificate to log
>> on, then that extra level of security would be enough. Our staff could
>> then connect to the server remotely only using their laptops which would
>> be certificated.
>>
>> Am I way off line thinking like this?
>>
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>
>
- Next message: Mark Gamache: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Previous message: Art Vandelay: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- In reply to: Mark Gamache: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Next in thread: Art Vandeley: "Re: Prevent logon without certificate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|