Re: netlogon error

From: Brown (fbrown_at_mta-inc.com)
Date: 01/07/05


Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:31:21 -0600

In the DNSMGNT console on the SBS box, all entries in the forward lookup
zone for the non-SBS box are identicle to the entries in the forward lookup
zone on the SBS box.
Brown
"Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:O9aGyKP9EHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> <quote>
> There is a netlogon.dns file deposited in the config folder in
> system32 on DCs, and these are unique toeach DC. The
> records that are recorded there in the nonSBSare what
> should now exist in the DNS on the SBS machine.
> </quote>
> If those records do not exist in the SBS DNS forward zones
> then the KCC (algoritm that generates the replication paths)
> will not be able to do its job.
>
> If you look in the Sites and Domains and drill in and do see
> that NTDS settings for the nonSBS does have replication links
> defined, then it is doing its job. If not, it may be that these DNS
> records did not get registered.
>
> --
> Roger Abell
> Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security)
> MCDBA, MCSE W2k3+W2k+Nt4
> "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> news:u3SC12M9EHA.960@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > OK, I launch the dnsmgmt console on the SBS box.
> > Under the SBS > Forward Lookup Zones > in the MTA-Inc.local folder, the
> > non-SBS box is listed.
> > I located the netlogon.dns file in windows\system32\config on the SBS
box.
> > Last modified 0718 this AM. (I had to stop and restart the box to
replace
> > a
> > faulty UPS this AM)
> > On the non-SBS box, same place last update 1356 yesterday (restart time)
> > Brown
> >
> > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> > news:OLyR5bM9EHA.4072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> Those messages when launching those tools on the nonSBS
> >> seems to indicate that the AD initial replication into it still
> >> has not happened.
> >>
> >> There is no software firewall configured on the SBS, right?
> >>
> >> You have not yet mentioned whether after yesterday morning
> >> when the DNS config of the nonSBS was changed, is the nonSBS
> >> now showing in the forward lookup zones when viewed in the
> >> SBS DNS mgmt UI. There is a netlogon.dns file deposited in
> >> the config folder in system32 on DCs, and these are unique to
> >> each DC. The records that are recorded there in the nonSBS
> >> are what should now exist in the DNS on the SBS machine.
> >>
> >> If you run Sites and Services on the SBS and drill in do you
> >> also see the nonSBS there? If so, do you see under its NTDS
> >> settings that there are replication links defined to it?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Roger
> >> "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> news:ezfFk2L9EHA.1524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> > The non-SBS does appear in the Domain Controllers OU on the SBS box.
> > With
> >> > the changes I have made in the last couple of days, when I launch AD
> > Users
> >> &
> >> > Computers on the non-SBS I get an error that states
> >> > "Naming information cannot be located becuase:
> >> > The target principal name is incorrect.
> >> > Contact your system administrator to verify that your domain is
> >> > properly
> >> > configured and is currently online."
> >> > Same message for AD Site & Services.
> >> > AD Domains & Trust gives the message
> >> > "The configuration information describing this enterprise is not
> >> available.
> >> > The target principal name is incorrect."
> >> >
> >> > It looks like something is not pointing to the right place, but I
have
> > no
> >> > clue.
> >> >
> >> > Brown
> >> >
> >> > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > news:Ow#phqF9EHA.3504@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> > > After the reboot, or also after waiting a while ?
> >> > > The replication does not complete instantly.
> >> > >
> >> > > When you use AD Users and Computers on the SBS do
> >> > > you see the W2k3 listed in the Domain Controllers OU ?
> >> > > It is starting to sound like it is not going to be there (meaning
> >> > > that the W2k3 believes it is supposed to be a DC but the SBS
> >> > > does not - something I can't understand happening except maybe
> >> > > if during dcpromo NetBios based RPC communications is
> >> > > interrupted early in the promo but is OK at the very start)
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Roger
> >> > > "Brown" <fbrown@knology.net> wrote in message
> >> > > news:%234PIOJF9EHA.3676@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > After the restart on the nonSBS machine this morning, when I open
> >> Active
> >> > > > Directory Users and Computers I indicates that AD is not running.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Brown
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:%234oS7IE9EHA.3012@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > > Those message are not unexpected the first time around, because
> >> > > > > the new DC has not yet completed its initial sync with the
> > existing
> >> > AD,
> >> > > > > and so does not have its own copy (which it was trying to
> >> > > > > access).
> >> > > > > One would expect those to go away in the future as when the DNS
> >> > > > > server code fires up it then will find the AD content it is
> >> > complaining
> >> > > > > about not finding now.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The issue is, do we have a functioning DC that does have
> > replication
> >> > > > > established with the SBS DC ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > At a cmd prompt run replmon and connect to the two DCs and
drill
> >> > > > > into the defined replications to see if things seem to be
> > happening.
> >> > > > > Alternatively, on the nonSBS run AD Users and Computers, use
the
> >> > > > > properties to make sure that you are focused on the nonSBS
> >> > > > > machine
> >> > > > > and the domain controller the tool is speaking with, and then
> > click
> >> > > > > around and see if it looks the same as when the tool is
connected
> >> > > > > to AD on the SBS machine.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security)
> >> > > > > MCDBA, MCSE W2k3+W2k+Nt4
> >> > > > > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > > news:%23P7OoiA9EHA.3944@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >> OK, Got through the steps and restarted. In the dnsmgmt
console
> > on
> >> > the
> >> > > > >> Win2K3, got a warning:
> >> > > > >> Event Type: Warning
> >> > > > >> Event Source: DNS
> >> > > > >> Event Category: None
> >> > > > >> Event ID: 4013
> >> > > > >> Date: 1/6/2005
> >> > > > >> Time: 9:40:16 AM
> >> > > > >> User: N/A
> >> > > > >> Computer: MTA-SERVER02
> >> > > > >> Description:
> >> > > > >> The DNS server was unable to open the Active Directory. This
> >> > > > >> DNS
> >> > > server
> >> > > > >> is
> >> > > > >> configured to use directory service information and can not
> > operate
> >> > > > >> without
> >> > > > >> access to the directory. The DNS server will wait for the
> >> directory
> >> > to
> >> > > > >> start. If the DNS server is started but the appropriate event
> > has
> >> > not
> >> > > > >> been
> >> > > > >> logged, then the DNS server is still waiting for the directory
> >> > > > >> to
> >> > > start.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> For more information, see Help and Support Center at
> >> > > > >> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
> >> > > > >> Data:
> >> > > > >> 0000: 2d 23 00 00 -#..
> >> > > > >> -------
> >> > > > >> Then got an error:
> >> > > > >> Event Type: Error
> >> > > > >> Event Source: DNS
> >> > > > >> Event Category: None
> >> > > > >> Event ID: 4000
> >> > > > >> Date: 1/6/2005
> >> > > > >> Time: 9:40:16 AM
> >> > > > >> User: N/A
> >> > > > >> Computer: MTA-SERVER02
> >> > > > >> Description:
> >> > > > >> The DNS server was unable to open Active Directory. This DNS
> >> server
> >> > is
> >> > > > >> configured to obtain and use information from the directory
for
> >> this
> >> > > zone
> >> > > > >> and is unable to load the zone without it. Check that the
> >> > > > >> Active
> >> > > > >> Directory
> >> > > > >> is functioning properly and reload the zone. The event data is
> > the
> >> > > error
> >> > > > >> code.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> For more information, see Help and Support Center at
> >> > > > >> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
> >> > > > >> Data:
> >> > > > >> 0000: 2d 23 00 00 -#..
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Brown
> >> > > > >> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > > > >> news:#9C#vFA9EHA.3504@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> On the nonSBS mta-server02 try reversing these DNS
> >> > > > >>> server settings in its Tcp/Ip properties
> >> > > > >>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.98
> >> > > > >>> 192.168.1.99
> >> > > > >>> so that 1.99 is the first listed DNS server IP
> >> > > > >>> (assuming 1.99 is the SBS)
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Then on the SBS temporarily change the DNS
> >> > > > >>> forward zone for MTA-inc.local so that it will
> >> > > > >>> allow unsecured dynamic updates instead of only
> >> > > > >>> secured dynamic updates. (This is found in the
> >> > > > >>> r-click properties of the MTA-inc.local forward
> >> > > > >>> zone node - first set focus on the node by clicking
> >> > > > >>> and then r-click into its context menu.)
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Next, on the nonSBS at cmd prompt run these three:
> >> > > > >>> ipconfig /registerdns
> >> > > > >>> net stop netlogon
> >> > > > >>> net start netlogon
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Take a look into the forward zone for MTA-inc.local
> >> > > > >>> in the DNS server on SBS to see if the there are now
> >> > > > >>> DNS records for mta-server02 indicating its 1.98 addy,
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> If so, try a reboot of the nonSBS.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> You will need to remember to set the forward zone
> >> > > > >>> back to allowing only secured dynamic updates after
> >> > > > >>> you are done. It would be good to leave both DCs
> >> > > > >>> set with their DNS servers in Tcp/Ip config set so
> >> > > > >>> that they first reference the other and next reference
> >> > > > >>> themselves - however, if doing this then both would
> >> > > > >>> need to be able to get out to the internet DNS servers.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> --
> >> > > > >>> Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> > > > >>> MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> > > > >>> "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> news:erOKNe$8EHA.2600@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > Here is the ipconfig:
> >> > > > >>> > Windows IP Configuration
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : mta-server02
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : MTA-inc.local
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : MTA-inc.local
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : SiS 900-Based PCI Fast
> >> > Ethernet
> >> > > > >>> Adapter
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-6E-AF-F9-6C
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.98
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.98
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > 192.168.1.99
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Brown
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > news:#aebW678EHA.1188@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > It is not unusual for a DC to fail to authenticate when
it
> >> > > > >>> > > has not yet completed becoming a DC.
> >> > > > >>> > > The requested output from
> >> > > > >>> > > ipconfig /all
> >> > > > >>> > > when run on the failing machine would help greatly in
> >> > > > >>> > > understanding from the previously provided netdiag output
> >> > > > >>> > > if there is a simple route to get the initial replication
> >> > > > >>> > > to
> >> > > > >>> > > complete so that the machine can complete its promotion.
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > --
> >> > > > >>> > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> > > > >>> > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> > > > >>> > > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > news:uY35RQz8EHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > In the Event Log I get the folloiwing message:
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Event Type: Warning
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Event Source: LSASRV
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Event Category: SPNEGO (Negotiator)
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Event ID: 40960
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Date: 1/5/2005
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Time: 7:18:18 AM
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > User: N/A
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Computer: MTA-SERVER02
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Description:
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > The Security System detected an authentication error
for
> > the
> >> > > > >>> > > > server
> >> > > > >>> > > > cifs/mta-main.MTA-inc.local. The failure code from
> >> > > authentication
> >> > > > >>> > protocol
> >> > > > >>> > > > Kerberos was "The attempted logon is invalid. This is
> > either
> >> > due
> >> > > > >>> > > > to
> >> > > > >> a
> >> > > > >>> > bad
> >> > > > >>> > > > username or authentication information.
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > (0xc000006d)".
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > For more information, see Help and Support Center at
> >> > > > >>> > > > http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Data:
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > 0000: 6d 00 00 c0 m..À
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > ----------------
> >> > > > >>> > > > Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > > news:Ot5o7Av8EHA.4004@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > '192.168.1.99' is IP of the SBS ?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Can you clarify for me a little just what you meant
by
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > It appears that the name for the Win2K3 on the
SBS2K3
> >> > server
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > is
> >> > > > >>> not
> >> > > > >>> > in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > sync
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > with the name on the Win2k3 server, but I cannot
> > locate
> >> an
> >> > > > >>> occurence
> >> > > > >>> > > > where
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > it is different.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Names as seen where ?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Can you post output from running, on the failing W2k3
> >> > (nonSBS)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > ipconfig /all
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> > > > >>> > > > > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > news:%23acMnep8EHA.2156@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > OK, I'm back - I have gone through the suggestions
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > and
> >> am
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > still
> >> > > > >> at
> >> > > > >>> a
> >> > > > >>> > > > loss.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Netdiag still shows problems on the Win2K3 server:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Domain membership test . . . . . . : Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [WARNING] Ths system volume has not been completely
> >> > > replicated
> >> > > > >> to
> >> > > > >>> > the
> >> > > > >>> > > > > local
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > machine. This machine is not working properly as a
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DC.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > ------
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS test . . . . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> re-registeration
> >> > > > >>> > on
> >> > > > >>> > > > DNS
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > server '192.168.1.99' failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > _ldap._tcp.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > re-registeration
> >> > > > >>> > > > > on
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS server '192.168.1.99' failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
_ldap._tcp.206600de-fb91-4786-8e91-7db1704af5a3.domains._msdcs.MTA-inc.local
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > . re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
> > failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> 67f85d0b-43cd-47df-948d-1a165f5851d7._msdcs.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > re-registeration
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > on DNS server '192.168.1.99' failed.DNS Error code:
> >> > > 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > _kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.MTA-inc.local.re-registeration
> >> on
> >> > > DNS
> >> > > > >>> > server
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > '192.168.1.99' failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > >
_kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>
> > _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >> _kerberos._tcp.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >> _kerberos._udp.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > _kpasswd._tcp.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Failed to fix: DC DNS entry
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > _kpasswd._udp.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > re-registeration on DNS server '192.168.1.99'
failed.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DNS Error code: 0x00002339
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Fix Failed: netdiag failed to re-register
> >> missing
> >> > > DNS
> >> > > > >>> > entries
> >> > > > >>> > > > for
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > this DC on DNS server '192.168.1.99'.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] No DNS servers have the DNS records for
this
> > DC
> >> > > > >>> registered.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > ------
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > DC list test . . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [WARNING] Cannot call DsBind to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > mta-main.MTA-inc.local
> >> > > > >>> > (192.168.1.99).
> >> > > > >>> > > > > [SEC_
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > E_WRONG_PRINCIPAL]
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > -------
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Trust relationship test. . . . . . : Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [WARNING] Don't have access to test your domain sid
> > for
> >> > > domain
> >> > > > >>> > > > 'MTA-INC'.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [Test skipped]
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Secure channel to domain 'MTA-INC' is
broken.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [ERROR_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT]
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > -----
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Kerberos test. . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > [FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for
> >> > > > >>> > > > > host/mta-server02.MTA-inc.local.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > -----
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > It appears that the name for the Win2K3 on the
SBS2K3
> >> > server
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > is
> >> > > > >>> not
> >> > > > >>> > in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > sync
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > with the name on the Win2k3 server, but I cannot
> > locate
> >> an
> >> > > > >>> occurence
> >> > > > >>> > > > where
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > it is different.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > news:eiCa33w6EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > No problem Frank. Let us know if you did not get
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > fixed up by this.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > BTW, if you can remote into the SBS then you
should
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > be able to open a remote desktop to the W2k3 from
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > within the SBS. Double remote desktop can be a
> > little
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > tedious but does work. Also, you can configure
the
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > SBS to directly mediate remote desktop connection
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to any internal machine should you so choose.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > "Brown" <fbrown@knology.net> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > news:%23OB%23Mfg6EHA.2032@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Roger, Thanks for the help. I have run the
> > netdiag
> >> > /fix
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > >>> it
> >> > > > >>> > > > looks
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > like
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > it has cleared up some of the problems. I am
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > back
> >> > home
> >> > > > >>> working
> >> > > > >>> > > via
> >> > > > >>> > > > > the
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > SBS
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > remote access. The 2K3 machine is not
available
> >> (part
> >> > > of
> >> > > > >> the
> >> > > > >>> > > > problem)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > so
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > I
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > will have to try to get back in to the office
to
> > do
> >> > it.
> >> > > I
> >> > > > >>> will
> >> > > > >>> > be
> >> > > > >>> > > > out
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > of
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > touch for several days, and may not be able to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > get
> >> > back
> >> > > to
> >> > > > >> it
> >> > > > >>> > > until
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > then.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > I
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > have your suggestions, and will see if that
takes
> >> care
> >> > > of
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > me
> >> > > > >>> > when
> >> > > > >>> > > I
> >> > > > >>> > > > > can
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > get
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > back on the machine.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I want to make sure you Steven know how much I
> >> > > appreciate
> >> > > > >> your
> >> > > > >>> > > > > patience
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > and
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > assistance.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Frank Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > news:%23v0SqWf6EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On the SBS first run
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > netdiag /fix
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Verify that the zones supporting the AD are
> >> > configured
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > secured dynamic updates allowed. For this,
run
> >> the
> >> > > DNS
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > mgmt UI and highlight each forward zone then
> >> rclick
> >> > > into
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > its properties. They should be AD integrated
> > and
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > allowing
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > secured dynamic updates.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On the failing W2k3 check that
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > - in tcp/ip settings the DNS server is the
SBS
> >> > machine
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > - in System properties (rclick my computer,
> >> > > properties)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > the full computer name is correct, right
> > domain
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > at cmd prompt run
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > net stop netlogon
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > net start netlogon
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > then rerun netdiag to see if it is clean.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Once clean, you will want to install DNS on
the
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > second DC (if not already) and have it host
the
> >> same
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > AD integrated zones as are on the other DNS
> >> service.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > optional/advised:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > After you have DNS fault tolerance, you
> >> could/should
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > configure each DC to point first to the other
> > and
> >> > then
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > to itself for DNS services in the Tcp/Ip
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > config.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > news:OKNECGf6EHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> OK, I ran dcdiag and netdiag on the 2K3
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> machine
> >> > > errors
> >> > > > >>> > > > abound ----
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> First: dcdiag > "Although the Guid name
> > <string
> >> of
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> stuff
> >> > > > >>> > here>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > couldn't
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> resolved, the server name
> > (server02.domain.local)
> >> > > > >> resolved
> >> > > > >>> to
> >> > > > >>> > > the
> >> > > > >>> > > > > IP
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > address
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> (192.168.1.98) and was pingable. Check that
> > the
> >> IP
> >> > > > >> address
> >> > > > >>> > is
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > registered
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> correctly with the DNS Server."
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> The other tests in dcdiag passed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Then: netdiag:> Domain membership test:
Failed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> "[WARNING]
> >> > > > >>> The
> >> > > > >>> > > > > system
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> volumehas not been completely replicated to
> > the
> >> > > local
> >> > > > >>> > machine.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > This
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> machine is not working properly as a DC."
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> DC test: failed "[WARNING] The DNS entries
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> for
> >> > this
> >> > > DC
> >> > > > >> are
> >> > > > >>> > not
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> registered
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> correctly on the DNS server '192.168.1.99'.
> >> Please
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> wait
> >> > > > >>> for
> >> > > > >>> > 30
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > minutes
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> DNS serfver replication. [FATAL] No DNS
> > servers
> >> > have
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> the
> >> > > > >>> DNS
> >> > > > >>> > > > > records
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > for
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> this DC registered."
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> DC list test: Failed [WARNING] Cannot call
> > DsBind
> >> > to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > main.domain.local
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> (192.168.1.99). [SEC_E_WRONG_PRINCIPAL]
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Trust Relationship test: Failed ....
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Kerberos test: Failed........
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> OK, HELP!! Where do I start??
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in
> >> message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
news:Oql3Ced6EHA.3124@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > and netdiag and dcdiag have told you . .
.
> > ?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Roger
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > "Brown" <fbrown@knology.net> wrote in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
news:OEn0igV6EHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > The SBS machine has 2 NICs but only one
is
> >> > > active.
> >> > > > >> The
> >> > > > >>> > > Win2K3
> >> > > > >>> > > > > has
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > one
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> NIC.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > DHCP is running on an external router.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote
in
> >> > > message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > news:uZpd85T6EHA.2192@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > For DC communications issues your
first
> >> stop
> >> > > shop
> >> > > > >> to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > get hints of what may be amiss is by
> >> running
> >> > on
> >> > > > >> each
> >> > > > >>> DC
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > netdiag and dcdiag utilities
(depending
> > on
> >> > > > >> versions,
> >> > > > >>> > you
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > may need to install the optional
support
> >> > tools
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > from
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> the
> >> > > > >>> > > > CD).
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > Which, if any, of these machines are
> >> > multihomed
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > (>1
> >> > > > >>> > nic)?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote in
> >> message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> news:O5OJURP6EHA.4008@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> I tried that, but since it is a DC
> >> (backup)
> >> > it
> >> > > > >> will
> >> > > > >>> > not
> >> > > > >>> > > > > allow
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> this.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Is
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> there any other way to get them to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> shake
> >> > > hands?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu>
wrote
> > in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > news:%23deks%23L6EHA.3124@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > did I actually forget to mention
that
> >> you
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > could
> >> > > > >>> try
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > resetting
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > the machine account (in AD Users
and
> >> > Comps)
> >> > > .
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > .
> >> > > > >> .
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > --
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Roger Abell
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > "Brown" <fbrown@mta-inc.com> wrote
in
> >> > > message
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > news:O2$c8m55EHA.2624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> I am running SBS 2003 Pro (MAIN),
> > with
> >> a
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> Win2K3
> >> > > > >>> > > > Standard
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > server
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> (SERVER02)
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> which is providing file server and
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> AD
> >> > > Backup
> >> > > > >>> tasks.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> I am getting an error messaage in
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> the
> >> > > System
> >> > > > >>> Event
> >> > > > >>> > > > > Viewer,
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > source
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Netlogon:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> "The session setup from the
computer
> >> > > SERVER02
> >> > > > >>> > failed
> >> > > > >>> > > to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > authenticate.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> The
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> name(s) of the account(s)
referenced
> > in
> >> > the
> >> > > > >>> > security
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > database
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> is
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > SERVER02$.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> The following error occured:
Access
> >> > > denied."
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> What do I need to do to correct
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> this?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> Brown
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS 2003 - SBS 2008 migration issues
    ... If I install hyperV on the SBS 2008 will it run a win2k3 server? ... It's not supported to install HyperV "on" the SBS box. ... You will need to add the printer in Printers under the Control Panel before you will be able to see the printer in the SBS Console, or add it manually to the console. ... Once the shared printer is setup and seen in the SBS Console, the best way to automatically deploy that printer is via the Print Services Role in the Windows Server 2008 Server Console. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: fax console on win2k client
    ... Thank you for posting in the SBS newsgroup. ... "Fax console" on a Windows 2000 client side in the SBS network. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: How to set permissions to allow user to edit AD
    ... You could make the user a "Power User" via the SBS Console Users. ... >> Drill down to the Container which holds the accounts you want the user to ... >> 1) Allow the user to use Active Directory Users and Computers probably ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Monitoring inbound faxes on shared fax SBS 2003
    ... To the best of my knowledge There is no ability to monitor the SBS Fax Server from a workstation. ... If the next reply from Chris to the item above is "that's how it is", then yes, I'll use a limited distribution group, and tell everyone else to use Fax Console when the monitorpersonare not in the office. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Windows 2003 SBS Administration does not work after antivirus
    ... I understand that your IE and administration ... console do not work after you uninstall McAee antivirus system from SBS ... administrative console relies on IE. ... On the Welcome to Microsoft Windows Small Business Server Setup page, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)