Re: User Memory Quotas
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: WinNT4 user without rights to 2003 server"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: netlogon error"
- In reply to: Bomber: "Re: User Memory Quotas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:04:12 -0700
Noop, but good question.
I have not found public info on this, but the mention of the
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;840342
(TS in W2k3 edition at least) reg values in the
ccs\control\Session manager\memory management
reg key sound real close to the ones controlling the heap.
You may need to open a support incident with PSS if this
has high impact on your environment.
-- Roger Abell Microsoft MVP (Windows Security) MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA "Bomber" <Bomber@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:BBCA57AB-4CE9-483B-8EA0-F6E49FA71D56@microsoft.com... > I read all the documents that you listed. I also have an issue with the > memory management. Mu issue revolves around article 184802, cause 2. > > My server is Windows 2000 (all versions). > > The appllication I run enables me to reduce the heap value from the default > 512 to 128. Which enables 160+ applications to be ran. However this > cripples other appilcations such as our Network backup. > > It seems the solution is to change the 'system-wide buffer of 48Mb > (user32.dll)', how can this be modified? > > Regards > > Richard > > "Roger Abell" wrote: > > > Hey, check this ancient KB out > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;156484 > > as it indicates that (then) perl multithreaded apps were known to > > show desktop heap leaks if processes terminated prematurely. > > > > Anyway, I had to poke around as the being hard wired seemed > > unlikely - undoc'd maybe, but hardwired no. I think this little > > bit of info published for terminal server may be the light . . . > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;840342 > > I would be pretty cautious about fooling with this until you have > > determined that it is not actually a misbehavior that is causing > > excess heap consumption, and until you have figured answer to > > the next . . . > > > > However, notice that your issue may be the number of desktops > > consumed, making you run of the buffer pool, rather than any > > one desktop running out of its allocation. In fact, this might > > seem more likely given some of what you have said about that > > wall you run into. > > For IIS specific issues take a look at > > cgi apps in IIS pre-v6 > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;217202 > > conserving desktop consumption in IIS 6 > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;831135 > > > > Other related KBs uncovered : > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;142676 > > which indicates use of the third SharedSection parameter to limit > > size of a non-interactive desktop heap allocation > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318677 > > mentioned if only because it confirms that "You cannot check the > > usage status of the desktop heap while an application is running" > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;126962 > > very old, mentions how NT3.5 had a much smaller heap allocation > > than did NT 3.1 (same as what is now current) in order to "increase > > performance". My gosh, did them walk this as a linked list !! > > -- > > Roger Abell > > Microsoft MVP (Windows Security) > > MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA > > "Bodger" <jbrown@jlbprof.com> wrote in message > > news:1103841900.970701.219820@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > > Hmm, something bothers me. Although this is likely our problem, it > > > seems hard to believe that their is a fixed size "system wide 48 mb > > > buffer" that all desktops are allocated from. > > > > > > Can this 48 mb buffer be increased? > > > > > > I am afraid if I tinker with it, some of my services will not properly > > > run. > > > > > > Thanx > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: WinNT4 user without rights to 2003 server"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: netlogon error"
- In reply to: Bomber: "Re: User Memory Quotas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|