Re: SMB signing
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: W2K3 and workgroup shares"
- Previous message: kusdjeff: "Custom Delegation in AD"
- In reply to: Marten: "SMB signing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:05:55 -0500
SMB signing does not need PKI. mad will work with kerberos and ntlm/ntlmv2. Each
packet is digitally signed to ensure authenticity and integrity but not
confidentiality like ipsec. The link below, while old, explains in more detail. ---
Steve
http://www.winnetmag.com/Windows/Article/ArticleID/477/477.html
"Marten" <Marten@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EAB5627E-A595-4DF0-9F42-022062C5DC95@microsoft.com...
> Is it possible to enable SMB signing without a PKI infrastructure. If so, how
> does it work?
>
> /Marten
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: W2K3 and workgroup shares"
- Previous message: kusdjeff: "Custom Delegation in AD"
- In reply to: Marten: "SMB signing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
