Re: Secure Server & Services

From: Oli Restorick [MVP] (oli_at_mvps.org)
Date: 08/30/04

  • Next message: Mario Castillo: "Server Documentation"
    Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:32:42 +0100
    
    

    You'd be securing a resouce, so that would mean requiring authentication
    through Kerberos with IPSec when accessing those resources. Therefore, you
    need all domain-joined machines to be able to do IPSec, which is not the
    default.

    Mike seems to think that IPSec is somewhat easier to set up than I do, so
    I'd be interested to know what resources Mike has for configuring this.
    Also, see the link I posted elsewhere in this thread on domain isolation.
    It's quite lengthy, though.

    The Microsoft web site has loads of resources on IPSec, but personally I
    think there's some way to go in explaining it in a more approachable way.
    The documentation I've seen seems to assume that you're already familiar
    with IPSec and are just learning the implementation. Also, there's a good
    online seminar available.

    Go to http://www.microsoft.com/seminar/default.mspx and select "view all
    presenations". Look for a seminar entitled "Improving Trust In Your
    Infrastructure With IPSec" by Steve Riley.

    One problem you'll face is that if you start securing the infrastructure
    (DNS, DHCP, WINS, Active Directory), you get into a tricky situation with
    new machines. They can't perform enough on the network to get joined to the
    domain because they're not joined to the domain.

    Oli

    "BOFH" <john.hamilton70@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
    news:2pf6clFk0bvnU1@uni-berlin.de...
    >I have the company laptops under a unique OU, can I implement IPSEC just
    >for
    > that OU?
    >
    > Ooooh headaches heacaches...users users
    >
    >
    > "BOFH" <john.hamilton70@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
    > news:2pf4lsFjugagU1@uni-berlin.de...
    >> Can you point me to any documentation on this subject?
    >>
    >> All I need is a basic setup to deny any machine that isnt on the
    >> domain...
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> "Oli Restorick [MVP]" <oli@mvps.org> wrote in message
    >> news:uMy75#gjEHA.3896@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    >> > IPSec is the ideeal solution here, but it does take some setting up and
    >> > careful consideration of what traffic you want to use IPSec for.
    >> >
    >> > If you just want to make it difficult for people to use non-domain
    >> members,
    >> > consider using IPSec to make the most commonly-accessed resource
    >> accessible
    >> > only by domain members. You can use IPSec AH with Kerberos to do this.
    >> If
    >> > you're not careful, though, it's very easy to set an IPSec policy with
    >> Group
    >> > Policy that it prevents communication with your domain controllers.
    > From
    >> > here, you have no way to undo this, so be careful and do plenty of
    >> testing.
    >> >
    >> > Sometimes a technical solution is not always the best for those who
    > breach
    >> > company policy. The most likely reason that your staff don't want to
    >> > be
    >> > domain members is that they plug their laptops into their home networks
    >> and
    >> > mistakenly believe that if they're joined to the domain, they won't be
    >> able
    >> > to do this. Since these machines are outside your control, you have no
    >> way
    >> > to patch them against vulnerability-of-the-day and no way to ensure
    >> > they
    >> get
    >> > patched. It won't be long before your network gets the next Blaster,
    >> > Sasser, Nimda, Code Red or Slammer unless you get support from your
    >> managers
    >> > to stop this happening. It's not really about being BOFH, it's about
    >> > protecting your company and protecting yourself, because no doubt the
    >> > fingers will be pointing at you rather than the idiots with the laptops
    >> when
    >> > the next worm hits your network.
    >> >
    >> > Hope this helps
    >> >
    >> > Oli
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > "BOFH" <john.hamilton70@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
    >> > news:2peuf8FjhcllU1@uni-berlin.de...
    >> > > It was an answer from another newgroup when I asked the same
    >> > > question...and
    >> > > I searched for it too with no useful results. Must have been a
    >> > > flight
    >> of
    >> > > fancy!
    >> > >
    >> > > How do I filter MAC addresses? (Another reply)
    >> > >
    >> > > I have 6 Windows 2003 servers, serving 250 or so PCs and 60 laptops.
    >> Its
    >> > > the damn laptops I have a problem with as some staff refuse to be a
    >> member
    >> > > of the domain. Being a BOFH I want to enforce company policy and
    >> restrict
    >> > > access to network resources and internet if they plug it in.
    >> > >
    >> > > Thanks for all your help :)
    >> > >
    >> > > "Miha Pihler" <mihap-news@atlantis.si> wrote in message
    >> > > news:eaw7legjEHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    >> > >> Domain verification is not a term I am familiar with in a context to
    >> what
    >> > >> you are looking for. Also if you run a search on Microsoft or Google
    > it
    >> > >> doesn't give any useful result to what you are looking for.
    >> > >>
    >> > >> Where did you hear this term and in what context?
    >> > >>
    >> > >> Mike
    >> > >>
    >> > >> "BOFH" <john.hamilton70@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
    >> > >> news:2pes2dFjsmqqU1@uni-berlin.de...
    >> > >> > Thanks Mike...
    >> > >> >
    >> > >> > Could you tell me what 'Domain Verification' is?
    >> > >> >
    >> > >> > I am so desperate to stop non-domain equipment from accessing my
    >> > > network.
    >> > >> >
    >> > >> > "Miha Pihler" <mihap-news@atlantis.si> wrote in message
    >> > >> > news:umoPh3ajEHA.3972@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    >> > >> > > Hi,
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > For now, there is no easy solution to prevent DHCP server
    >> > >> > > issuing
    >> IPs
    >> > > to
    >> > >> > non
    >> > >> > > domain clients. This is usually a problem when clients come in
    > the
    >> > >> office
    >> > >> > > and want to plug their computer into your LAN. If you are
    >> > >> > > worried
    >> > > about
    >> > >> > > attacks well you should be. Even without DHCP it is pretty easy
    > to
    >> > >> figure
    >> > >> > > out what IPs you use on your LAN. E.g. if you use Exchange mail
    >> > >> > > server
    >> > > I
    >> > >> > can
    >> > >> > > look in header of any e-mail from your organization and find out
    > on
    >> > > what
    >> > >> > IP
    >> > >> > > your Exchange server is running)... Now I can pretty much guess
    >> what
    >> > > IP
    >> > >> I
    >> > >> > > have to set manually to get access to your LAN and Internet even
    >> > > without
    >> > >> > > DHCP.
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > There are few things you can do.
    >> > >> > > If you only want to prevent access to internet and you don't
    >> > >> > > have
    >> > >> problem
    >> > >> > > with customers browsing your LAN setup a proxy (e.g. ISA
    >> > >> > > server).
    >> You
    >> > >> can
    >> > >> > > setup ISA in a way that would require every user to authenticate
    >> > >> > themselves
    >> > >> > > before they are granted access to the internet (user need a
    >> > >> > > valid
    >> > >> account
    >> > >> > in
    >> > >> > > domain or some other database).
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > If you also want to prevent access to LAN first thing you can
    >> > >> > > do,
    >> > > don't
    >> > >> > > patch all network outlets to network backbone. Even if someone
    >> comes
    >> > > to
    >> > >> > your
    >> > >> > > office and plugs his computer with his own cable to the network
    >> > >> > > outlet
    >> > >> > > he/she still won't have any access to the network.
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > Next thing you can do is port authentication (IEEE 802.1x). This
    > is
    >> > >> > probably
    >> > >> > > not the cheapest solution since you need switches that support
    > IEEE
    >> > >> > 802.1x.
    >> > >> > > Next thing you need are clients that are Windows 2000 SP4 or
    > newer.
    >> > > Once
    >> > >> > the
    >> > >> > > client connects to the network they have to present
    > authentication
    >> > >> > > parameters (username and password) and these are checked against
    >> e.g.
    >> > >> > Active
    >> > >> > > Directory (using IAS - RADIUS)...
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > You could also setup IPSec policy for your domain. This would
    >> prevent
    >> > >> any
    >> > >> > > computer that is not part of domain to communicate with other
    >> members
    >> > > of
    >> > >> > > domain since Kerberos is used for IPSec authentication.
    >> > >> > > Even if virus infected computer comes to your office and it is
    > not
    >> > > part
    >> > >> of
    >> > >> > > your domain other computers will discard any connection from
    >> > >> > > this
    >> > >> computer
    >> > >> > > since it doesn't use IPSec...
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > I hope this helps,
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > Mike
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > > "BOFH" <john.hamilton70@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
    >> > >> > > news:2pdlclFjhe24U1@uni-berlin.de...
    >> > >> > > > I have DHCP on the server, it issues addresses to non-domain
    >> > > computers
    >> > >> > > too,
    >> > >> > > > which allows them use of the internet. I wish to block this.
    >> > >> > > >
    >> > >> > > > I have heard the term 'Domain Verification'...what is it and
    > what
    >> > > can
    >> > >> it
    >> > >> > > do
    >> > >> > > > for me?
    >> > >> > > >
    >> > >> > > >
    >> > >> > > > BOFH
    >> > >> > > >
    >> > >> > > >
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> > >
    >> > >> >
    >> > >> >
    >> > >>
    >> > >>
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> >
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >
    >


  • Next message: Mario Castillo: "Server Documentation"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Is it possible access limitation on Computer Accounts?
      ... Is it possible that only some computer can access these resources? ... For user access, the standard answer it so to use permission. ... Use permissions to restrict it to domain users and IPSec ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
    • Re: Should I install Certificate Authority to solve these problems ?
      ... You can use IPsec with or without certs from your PKI. ... negotiations to your AD machines or those trusting the ... > In the item 1 below, the tool in use is a HP server management tool (type ... >>> Management is pushing to get Certificate Authority ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
    • Help! ipsec not talking IKE
      ... I'm trying to get ipsec working. ... host-to-host setup, with a PSK going as a test/proof of concept. ... machines are on the same subnet, but to avoid interfering with what's ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)
    • Re: IPSEC config
      ... spdadd 10.20.30.0/24 172.28.56.0/23 any -P out ipsec ... 15:24:18.927721 sunburn> acesfbsd: icmp: echo request ... fxp0: flags=8943mtu ... Then I have two machines on these nets that have routing pointing to ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: I have a few dumb questions
      ... on my DC and other machines in the domain, ... but if I disable IPSec on the DC and then on the other machines in the ... I forced a policy refresh, ... apparently missing a step even though I can visually verify that IPSec ...
      (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsa)